File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1128/JCM.01279-11
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-80053538503
- PMID: 21832017
- WOS: WOS:000295360700014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Extent of antigenic cross-reactivity among highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses
Title | Extent of antigenic cross-reactivity among highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Publisher | American Society for Microbiology. |
Citation | Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011, v. 49 n. 10, p. 3531-3536 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses emerged in 1996 and have since evolved so extensively that a single strain can no longer be used as a prepandemic vaccine or diagnostic reagent. We therefore sought to identify the H5N1 strains that may best serve as cross-reactive diagnostic reagents. We compared the cross-reactivity of 27 viruses of clades 0, 1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 4 and of four computationally designed ancestral H5N1 strains by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays. Antigenic cartography was used to analyze the large quantity of resulting data. Cartographs of HI titers with chicken red blood cells were similar to those of MN titers, but HI with horse red blood cells decreased antigenic distances among the H5N1 strains studied. Thus, HI with horse red blood cells seems to be the assay of choice for H5N1 diagnostics. Whereas clade 2.2 antigens were able to detect antibodies raised to most of the tested H5N1 viruses (and clade 2.2-specific antisera detected most of the H5N1 antigens), ancestral strain A exhibited the widest reactivity pattern and hence was the best candidate diagnostic reagent for broad detection of H5N1 strains. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/166791 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.653 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ducatez, MF | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cai, Z | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Peiris, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Guan, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ye, Z | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wan, XF | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Webby, RJ | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-20T08:48:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-20T08:48:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011, v. 49 n. 10, p. 3531-3536 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0095-1137 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/166791 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses emerged in 1996 and have since evolved so extensively that a single strain can no longer be used as a prepandemic vaccine or diagnostic reagent. We therefore sought to identify the H5N1 strains that may best serve as cross-reactive diagnostic reagents. We compared the cross-reactivity of 27 viruses of clades 0, 1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 4 and of four computationally designed ancestral H5N1 strains by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays. Antigenic cartography was used to analyze the large quantity of resulting data. Cartographs of HI titers with chicken red blood cells were similar to those of MN titers, but HI with horse red blood cells decreased antigenic distances among the H5N1 strains studied. Thus, HI with horse red blood cells seems to be the assay of choice for H5N1 diagnostics. Whereas clade 2.2 antigens were able to detect antibodies raised to most of the tested H5N1 viruses (and clade 2.2-specific antisera detected most of the H5N1 antigens), ancestral strain A exhibited the widest reactivity pattern and hence was the best candidate diagnostic reagent for broad detection of H5N1 strains. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Society for Microbiology. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Microbiology | en_US |
dc.rights | Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Copyright © American Society for Microbiology. | - |
dc.rights | Copyright © American Society for Microbiology, [Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011, v. 49 n. 10, p. 3531-3536] | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Antibodies, Viral - immunology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Antigens, Viral - immunology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Chickens | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Cross Reactions | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype - classification - immunology | - |
dc.title | Extent of antigenic cross-reactivity among highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Peiris, M: malik@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Guan, Y: yguan@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Webby, RJ: richard.webby@stjude.org | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Peiris, JSM=rp00410 | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Guan, Y=rp00397 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1128/JCM.01279-11 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21832017 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC3187336 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-80053538503 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 211256 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 49 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 3531 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 3536 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000295360700014 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ducatez, MF=10044731300 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cai, Z=8941786700 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Peiris, M=7005486823 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Guan, Y=7202924055 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ye, Z=7401956778 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wan, XF=9335365800 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Webby, RJ=35448064800 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0095-1137 | - |