File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-44949153447
- WOS: WOS:000252743900003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Dynamic assessment and the "interactive examination"
Title | Dynamic assessment and the "interactive examination" |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Assessment Oral Health Education Self-Assessment Teacher Education |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Publisher | International Forum of Educational Technology & Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ifets.info/ |
Citation | Educational Technology And Society, 2007, v. 10 n. 4, p. 17-27 How to Cite? |
Abstract | To assess own actions and define individual learning needs is fundamental for professional development. The development of self-assessment skills requires practice and feedback during the course of studies. The "Interactive Examination" is a methodology aiming to assist students developing their self-assessment skills. The present study describes the methodology and presents the results from a multicentre evaluation study at the Faculty of Odontology (OD) and School of Teacher Education (LUT) at Malmö University, Sweden. During the examination, students assessed their own competence and their self-assessments were matched to the judgement of their instructors (OD) or to their examination results (LUT). Students then received a personal task, which they had to respond to in written text. After submitting their response, the students received a document representing the way an "expert" in the field chose to deal with the same task. They then had to prepare a "comparison document", where they identified differences between their own and the "expert" answer. Results showed that students appreciated the examination in both institutions. There was a somewhat different pattern of self-assessment in the two centres, and the qualitative analysis of students' comparison documents also revealed some interesting institutional differences. © International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS). |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167034 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.559 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jönsson, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mattheos, N | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Svingby, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Attström, R | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-28T04:02:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-28T04:02:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Educational Technology And Society, 2007, v. 10 n. 4, p. 17-27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1176-3647 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167034 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To assess own actions and define individual learning needs is fundamental for professional development. The development of self-assessment skills requires practice and feedback during the course of studies. The "Interactive Examination" is a methodology aiming to assist students developing their self-assessment skills. The present study describes the methodology and presents the results from a multicentre evaluation study at the Faculty of Odontology (OD) and School of Teacher Education (LUT) at Malmö University, Sweden. During the examination, students assessed their own competence and their self-assessments were matched to the judgement of their instructors (OD) or to their examination results (LUT). Students then received a personal task, which they had to respond to in written text. After submitting their response, the students received a document representing the way an "expert" in the field chose to deal with the same task. They then had to prepare a "comparison document", where they identified differences between their own and the "expert" answer. Results showed that students appreciated the examination in both institutions. There was a somewhat different pattern of self-assessment in the two centres, and the qualitative analysis of students' comparison documents also revealed some interesting institutional differences. © International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS). | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | International Forum of Educational Technology & Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ifets.info/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Educational Technology and Society | en_US |
dc.subject | Assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | Oral Health Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-Assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | Teacher Education | en_US |
dc.title | Dynamic assessment and the "interactive examination" | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Mattheos, N: mattheos@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Mattheos, N=rp01662 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-44949153447 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-44949153447&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000252743900003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | New Zealand | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Jönsson, A=22979897100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mattheos, N=6602862633 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Svingby, G=22981570500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Attström, R=7005222726 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1176-3647 | - |