File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00546.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-68949180101
- PMID: 19281515
- WOS: WOS:000263258800008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Assessment of knowledge and competencies related to implant dentistry in undergraduate and postgraduate university education
Title | Assessment of knowledge and competencies related to implant dentistry in undergraduate and postgraduate university education |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Assessment Clinical competencies Dental education Examination Implant dentistry Knowledge. School of Medicine and Oral Health Postgraduate Skills Undergraduate |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/EJE |
Citation | European Journal Of Dental Education, 2009, v. 13 SUPPL1., p. 56-65 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Learning in academic settings is strongly related to the way the students are tested or examined. Assessment therefore must be integrated in the curriculum design, coordinated and should reflect the learning outcomes of the education. Assessment within the field of implant dentistry must fulfil four major objectives: complete and direct the learning process with feedback (formative), ensure that students are adequately prepared (summative), assess attitudes and skills such as critical thinking, reflection and self-assessment ability, and supply continuous feedback to teachers on curricular content and impact. Different assessment methods should be used to assess different levels of competencies throughout the curriculum. Various forms of written or oral assessment methodologies are applicable at earlier stages in the curriculum. At intermediate levels, interactive assessment methods, such as patient simulations (paper based or virtual) and more could encourage the necessary synthesis of several disciplines and aspects of the theoretical knowledge. At higher levels of competence, documentation of clinical proficiency by means of reflective portfolios and diaries is an appropriate assessment method with both formative and summative potential. The highest level of competence requires performance assessment using structured, objective, clinical criteria. The group strongly encourages the use of reflective forms of assessment methods which engage the students in a process of self-appraisal, identification of individual learning needs and self-directed learning. The ultimate goal of this would be to allow the student to develop a lifelong learning attitude. © 2009 Blackwell Munksgaard. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167037 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.633 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mattheos, N | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ucer, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Van De Velde, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nattestad, A | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-28T04:02:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-28T04:02:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | European Journal Of Dental Education, 2009, v. 13 SUPPL1., p. 56-65 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1396-5883 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167037 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Learning in academic settings is strongly related to the way the students are tested or examined. Assessment therefore must be integrated in the curriculum design, coordinated and should reflect the learning outcomes of the education. Assessment within the field of implant dentistry must fulfil four major objectives: complete and direct the learning process with feedback (formative), ensure that students are adequately prepared (summative), assess attitudes and skills such as critical thinking, reflection and self-assessment ability, and supply continuous feedback to teachers on curricular content and impact. Different assessment methods should be used to assess different levels of competencies throughout the curriculum. Various forms of written or oral assessment methodologies are applicable at earlier stages in the curriculum. At intermediate levels, interactive assessment methods, such as patient simulations (paper based or virtual) and more could encourage the necessary synthesis of several disciplines and aspects of the theoretical knowledge. At higher levels of competence, documentation of clinical proficiency by means of reflective portfolios and diaries is an appropriate assessment method with both formative and summative potential. The highest level of competence requires performance assessment using structured, objective, clinical criteria. The group strongly encourages the use of reflective forms of assessment methods which engage the students in a process of self-appraisal, identification of individual learning needs and self-directed learning. The ultimate goal of this would be to allow the student to develop a lifelong learning attitude. © 2009 Blackwell Munksgaard. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/EJE | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Dental Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Assessment | - |
dc.subject | Clinical competencies | - |
dc.subject | Dental education | - |
dc.subject | Examination | - |
dc.subject | Implant dentistry | - |
dc.subject | Knowledge. School of Medicine and Oral Health | - |
dc.subject | Postgraduate | - |
dc.subject | Skills | - |
dc.subject | Undergraduate | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Clinical Competence - Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Curriculum - Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implantation - Education - Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Education, Dental - Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Educational Measurement - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Europe | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prosthodontics - Education - Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - Education - Standards | en_US |
dc.title | Assessment of knowledge and competencies related to implant dentistry in undergraduate and postgraduate university education | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Mattheos, N: mattheos@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Mattheos, N=rp01662 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00546.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19281515 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-68949180101 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-68949180101&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | SUPPL1. | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 56 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 65 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000263258800008 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Denmark | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mattheos, N=6602862633 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ucer, C=23398840100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Van De Velde, T=17347465100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Nattestad, A=6701582728 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1396-5883 | - |