File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/rcm.570
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0036007820
- PMID: 11803545
- WOS: WOS:000173654300011
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Experimental validation of Gaussian-3 lithium cation affinities of amides: Implications for the gas-phase lithium cation basicity scale
Title | Experimental validation of Gaussian-3 lithium cation affinities of amides: Implications for the gas-phase lithium cation basicity scale |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2002 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0951-4198/ |
Citation | Rapid Communications In Mass Spectrometry, 2002, v. 16 n. 3, p. 229-237 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Using a refined Gaussian-3 (G3) protocol, the highest level of ab initio calculations reported so far, we have established the Li+ cation binding enthalpy (affinity) at 0 K (in kJ mol-1) for formamide (195.7), N-methylformamide (209.2), N,N′-dimethylformamide (220.0), acetamide (211.7), N-methyl-acetamide (222.5), and N,N′-dimethylacetamide (230.1), with an estimated maximum uncertainty of ±8 kJ mol-1. With these six theoretical lithium cation binding affinities as reference values, the absolute Li+ affinities of imidazole and dimethoxyethane were determined by the extended kinetic method, and by adopting the statistical data treatment protocol recently proposed by Armentrout. The Li+ affinities obtained for these two ligands are in good agreement (within 6 kJ mol-1) with recent values determined by the threshold collision-induced dissociation method, and consistent with the Li+ basicity values first reported by Taft and co-workers in 1990. Our study confirms that the previously suggested, and recently implemented, downward revision of Taft's original basicity scale by 10.9 kJ mol-1 is justified for ligands with revised basicities less than 151 kJ mol-1. However, for selected ligands with Li+ basicities greater than 151 kJ mol-1, including some of the six amides studied in this work, the reported discrepancy between theoretical and experimental estimates in the revised Li+ basicity scale of Burk et al. is likely to arise from experimental uncertainties. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167724 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.375 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tsang, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Siu, FM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, NL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tsang, CW | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-08T03:10:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-08T03:10:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rapid Communications In Mass Spectrometry, 2002, v. 16 n. 3, p. 229-237 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0951-4198 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167724 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Using a refined Gaussian-3 (G3) protocol, the highest level of ab initio calculations reported so far, we have established the Li+ cation binding enthalpy (affinity) at 0 K (in kJ mol-1) for formamide (195.7), N-methylformamide (209.2), N,N′-dimethylformamide (220.0), acetamide (211.7), N-methyl-acetamide (222.5), and N,N′-dimethylacetamide (230.1), with an estimated maximum uncertainty of ±8 kJ mol-1. With these six theoretical lithium cation binding affinities as reference values, the absolute Li+ affinities of imidazole and dimethoxyethane were determined by the extended kinetic method, and by adopting the statistical data treatment protocol recently proposed by Armentrout. The Li+ affinities obtained for these two ligands are in good agreement (within 6 kJ mol-1) with recent values determined by the threshold collision-induced dissociation method, and consistent with the Li+ basicity values first reported by Taft and co-workers in 1990. Our study confirms that the previously suggested, and recently implemented, downward revision of Taft's original basicity scale by 10.9 kJ mol-1 is justified for ligands with revised basicities less than 151 kJ mol-1. However, for selected ligands with Li+ basicities greater than 151 kJ mol-1, including some of the six amides studied in this work, the reported discrepancy between theoretical and experimental estimates in the revised Li+ basicity scale of Burk et al. is likely to arise from experimental uncertainties. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0951-4198/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Algorithms | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Amides - Chemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Hydrogen-Ion Concentration | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ions | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Kinetics | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ligands | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Lithium - Chemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mass Spectrometry | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Thermodynamics | en_US |
dc.title | Experimental validation of Gaussian-3 lithium cation affinities of amides: Implications for the gas-phase lithium cation basicity scale | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Siu, FM:fmsiu@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Siu, FM=rp00776 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/rcm.570 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11803545 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0036007820 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036007820&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 16 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 229 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 237 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000173654300011 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tsang, Y=7007101142 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Siu, FM=6701518489 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ma, NL=7103357185 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tsang, CW=7202935952 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0951-4198 | - |