File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/fampra/10.4.431
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0027717177
- PMID: 8168680
- WOS: WOS:A1993NA17400013
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: An international perspective on the cholesterol debate
Title | An international perspective on the cholesterol debate |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 1993 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/ |
Citation | Family Practice, 1993, v. 10 n. 4, p. 431-438 How to Cite? |
Abstract | For the past 5 years there has been an intensive debate and a number of conflicting guidelines suggesting what general practitioners (GPs) should do to screen and manage hyperlipidaemia. At a WONCA seminar in Vancouver in 1992, policies and guidelines from Canada, the UK, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Hong Kong and the USA were reviewed. It was concluded that cholesterol policy and guidelines tend to be influenced more by political and economic factors than by evidence of health benefit. International guidelines for cholesterol screening and management would be of minimal value, as GPs would have to interpret the epidemiological evidence of benefit from lipid screening and lipid lowering strategy in the context of each patient to arrive at optimum management. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/168671 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.917 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Rosser, WW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, WH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fowler, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lamberts, H | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thomson, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Frame, PS | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-08T03:28:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-08T03:28:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1993 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Family Practice, 1993, v. 10 n. 4, p. 431-438 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0263-2136 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/168671 | - |
dc.description.abstract | For the past 5 years there has been an intensive debate and a number of conflicting guidelines suggesting what general practitioners (GPs) should do to screen and manage hyperlipidaemia. At a WONCA seminar in Vancouver in 1992, policies and guidelines from Canada, the UK, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Hong Kong and the USA were reviewed. It was concluded that cholesterol policy and guidelines tend to be influenced more by political and economic factors than by evidence of health benefit. International guidelines for cholesterol screening and management would be of minimal value, as GPs would have to interpret the epidemiological evidence of benefit from lipid screening and lipid lowering strategy in the context of each patient to arrive at optimum management. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Family Practice | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cholesterol - Blood | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Family Practice | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Policy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Hypercholesterolemia - Diagnosis - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Lipids - Blood | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mass Screening | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Practice Guidelines As Topic | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | World Health | en_US |
dc.title | An international perspective on the cholesterol debate | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, C:clklam@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, C=rp00350 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/fampra/10.4.431 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 8168680 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0027717177 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 431 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 438 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1993NA17400013 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Rosser, WW=7005454806 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Palmer, WH=7103208789 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fowler, G=16197197300 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lamberts, H=7004900310 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Thomson, A=7403717513 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, C=24755913900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Frame, PS=8210658400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0263-2136 | - |