File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.010
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-34548026043
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Application of generalizability theory in the investigation of the quality of journal writing in mathematics
Title | Application of generalizability theory in the investigation of the quality of journal writing in mathematics |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/stueduc |
Citation | Studies In Educational Evaluation, 2007, v. 33 n. 3-4, p. 371-383 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This study examined the use of generalizability theory to evaluate the quality of an alternative assessment (journal writing) in mathematics. Twenty-nine junior college students wrote journal tasks on the given topics and two raters marked the tasks using a scoring rubric, constituting a two-facet G-study design in which students were crossed with tasks and raters. The G coefficient was .76 and index of dependability was .72. The results showed that increasing the number of tasks had a larger effect on the G coefficient and index of dependability than increasing the number of raters. Implications for educational practices are discussed. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/169029 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.084 |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nie, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yeo, SM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, S | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-08T03:40:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-08T03:40:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Studies In Educational Evaluation, 2007, v. 33 n. 3-4, p. 371-383 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0191-491X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/169029 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study examined the use of generalizability theory to evaluate the quality of an alternative assessment (journal writing) in mathematics. Twenty-nine junior college students wrote journal tasks on the given topics and two raters marked the tasks using a scoring rubric, constituting a two-facet G-study design in which students were crossed with tasks and raters. The G coefficient was .76 and index of dependability was .72. The results showed that increasing the number of tasks had a larger effect on the G coefficient and index of dependability than increasing the number of raters. Implications for educational practices are discussed. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/stueduc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Studies in Educational Evaluation | en_US |
dc.title | Application of generalizability theory in the investigation of the quality of journal writing in mathematics | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lau, S:slau08@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lau, S=rp00635 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-34548026043 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-34548026043&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3-4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 371 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 383 | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Nie, Y=19337388700 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yeo, SM=19338096700 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, S=33968324900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0191-491X | - |