File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Choices, choices: Comparing between CHOC'LATE and the classification-tree methodology

TitleChoices, choices: Comparing between CHOC'LATE and the classification-tree methodology
Authors
Poon, PLChen, TYTse, TH
KeywordsChoice Relation Framework
Classification-Tree Methodology
Software Testing
Issue Date2012
PublisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.com/content/105633/
Citation
Lecture Notes In Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes In Artificial Intelligence And Lecture Notes In Bioinformatics), 2012, v. 7308 LNCS, p. 162-176 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30598-6_12
AbstractTwo popular specification-based test case generation methods are the choice relation framework and the classification-tree methodology. Both of them come with associated tools and have been used in different applications with success. Since both methods are based on the idea of partition testing, they are similar in many aspects. Because of their similarities, software testers often find it difficult to decide which method to be used in a given testing scenario. This paper aims to provide a solution by first contrasting the strengths and weaknesses of both methods, followed by suggesting practical selection guidelines to cater for different testing scenarios. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.
DescriptionThe issue has book title: Reliable Software Technologies (Ada-Europe 2012)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/169757
ISSN
0302-9743
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.249
References
References in Scopus

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPoon, PLen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, TYen_US
dc.contributor.authorTse, THen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-25T04:55:05Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-25T04:55:05Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationLecture Notes In Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes In Artificial Intelligence And Lecture Notes In Bioinformatics), 2012, v. 7308 LNCS, p. 162-176en_US
dc.identifier.issn0302-9743en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/169757-
dc.descriptionThe issue has book title: Reliable Software Technologies (Ada-Europe 2012)-
dc.description.abstractTwo popular specification-based test case generation methods are the choice relation framework and the classification-tree methodology. Both of them come with associated tools and have been used in different applications with success. Since both methods are based on the idea of partition testing, they are similar in many aspects. Because of their similarities, software testers often find it difficult to decide which method to be used in a given testing scenario. This paper aims to provide a solution by first contrasting the strengths and weaknesses of both methods, followed by suggesting practical selection guidelines to cater for different testing scenarios. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.com/content/105633/en_US
dc.relation.ispartofLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)en_US
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of a conference paper published in Reliable Software Technologies – Ada-Europe 2012. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30598-6_12-
dc.subjectChoice Relation Frameworken_US
dc.subjectClassification-Tree Methodologyen_US
dc.subjectSoftware Testingen_US
dc.titleChoices, choices: Comparing between CHOC'LATE and the classification-tree methodologyen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailTse, TH: thtse@cs.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityTse, TH=rp00546en_US
dc.description.naturepostprinten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-642-30598-6_12en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84862506133en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros198994-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84862506133&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume7308 LNCSen_US
dc.identifier.spage162en_US
dc.identifier.epage176en_US
dc.publisher.placeGermanyen_US
dc.description.otherProceedings of the 17th Ada-Europe International Conference on Reliable Software Technologies, Stockholm, Sweden, June 11-15, 2012. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2012, v. 7308, p. 162-176-
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPoon, PL=7101925990en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChen, TY=13104290200en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTse, TH=7005496974en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0302-9743-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats