File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Computed tomographic osteometry of Asian lumbar pedicles

TitleComputed tomographic osteometry of Asian lumbar pedicles
Authors
KeywordsAsian pedicle dimensions pedicle osteotomy transverse angle
Issue Date1994
PublisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.spinejournal.com
Citation
Spine, 1994, v. 19 n. 13, p. 1495-1498 How to Cite?
AbstractStudy Design. The lumbar pedicles of 100 adult Chinese patients were studied with computed tomography to provide data on their dimensions and angular alignment. Data obtained were compared with published measurements of spines from white patients to determine similarities and differences between the lumbar spines. Summary of Background Data. The age range of the patients was 18 to 60 years. There were 63 men and 37 women. There was no demonstrable sex difference for dimensions or angular alignment of the pedicles. Methods. The method of scanning and measurement was standardized. Levels considered abnormal by the radiologist were excluded from the study, and a single observer was used to avoid inter-observer errors. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using Student's t test to determine differences between men and women and left and right sides. Age differences were analyzed using the F statistic test. The pedicle inclination angle (transverse angle) and the pedicle dimensions were compared with published data of whites. Results. The pedicles of Asians, when compared with those of whites, showed a similar pattern of changes with vertebral level. However, Asian pedicles had a larger pedicle inclination angle (transverse angle) from L1 to L4 (L1 = 16°, L2 = 16°, L3 = 19°, L4 = 23°), whereas L5 (29°) was similar to many series of whites. Conclusions. There are differences between the lumbar pedicles of Asians and whites. Such differences need to be considered when posterior pedicle screw fixation of the spine is performed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/169999
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.241
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.657
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, KMCen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuan, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, FLen_US
dc.contributor.authorFang, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:04:37Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:04:37Z-
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.citationSpine, 1994, v. 19 n. 13, p. 1495-1498en_US
dc.identifier.issn0362-2436en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/169999-
dc.description.abstractStudy Design. The lumbar pedicles of 100 adult Chinese patients were studied with computed tomography to provide data on their dimensions and angular alignment. Data obtained were compared with published measurements of spines from white patients to determine similarities and differences between the lumbar spines. Summary of Background Data. The age range of the patients was 18 to 60 years. There were 63 men and 37 women. There was no demonstrable sex difference for dimensions or angular alignment of the pedicles. Methods. The method of scanning and measurement was standardized. Levels considered abnormal by the radiologist were excluded from the study, and a single observer was used to avoid inter-observer errors. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using Student's t test to determine differences between men and women and left and right sides. Age differences were analyzed using the F statistic test. The pedicle inclination angle (transverse angle) and the pedicle dimensions were compared with published data of whites. Results. The pedicles of Asians, when compared with those of whites, showed a similar pattern of changes with vertebral level. However, Asian pedicles had a larger pedicle inclination angle (transverse angle) from L1 to L4 (L1 = 16°, L2 = 16°, L3 = 19°, L4 = 23°), whereas L5 (29°) was similar to many series of whites. Conclusions. There are differences between the lumbar pedicles of Asians and whites. Such differences need to be considered when posterior pedicle screw fixation of the spine is performed.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.spinejournal.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSpineen_US
dc.subjectAsian pedicle dimensions pedicle osteotomy transverse angle-
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAsian Continental Ancestry Groupen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Screwsen_US
dc.subject.meshEuropean Continental Ancestry Groupen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHong Kongen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshLumbar Vertebrae - Anatomy & Histology - Radiography - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshReference Valuesen_US
dc.subject.meshSpinal Fusionen_US
dc.subject.meshTomography, X-Ray Computeden_US
dc.titleComputed tomographic osteometry of Asian lumbar pediclesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailCheung, KMC:cheungmc@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, KMC=rp00387en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/00007632-199407000-00014-
dc.identifier.pmid7939981-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0028200824en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros2812-
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue13en_US
dc.identifier.spage1495en_US
dc.identifier.epage1498en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1994NX02300014-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, KMC=7402406754en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridRuan, D=7004456354en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, FL=7202586444en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFang, D=20134136000en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0362-2436-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats