Proximal and distal dog coronary arteries respond differently to basal EDRF but not to NO

Abstract

Experiments were designed to analyze the effects of endothelium-derived relaxing factor(s) (EDRF; released basally or on stimulation with acetylcholine) and nitric oxide (NO) on smooth muscle of coronary arteries of different diameter. During contractions of the bioassay ring evoked with prostaglandin F(2α), the relaxations caused by basal EDRF were greater in the distal than in the proximal coronary arteries, whereas there was no difference in response to the EDRF released by acetylcholine. During direct superfusion, NO caused similar relaxations in proximal and distal coronary artery rings. Optimal tension, prostaglandin F(2α)-induced contractions, and relaxations caused by sodium nitroprusside were comparable in both preparations. In rings of proximal and distal coronary artery studied in organ chambers, acetylcholine caused comparable endothelium-dependent, whereas sodium nitroprusside and NO cause comparable endothelium-independent relaxations. These experiments indicate a difference in response of different-sized coronary arteries to basally released EDRF and suggest that the basally released factor differs from NO.