File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1136/gut.29.12.1648
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0024223470
- PMID: 3220304
- WOS: WOS:A1988R617000006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effects of alcohols on gastric and small intestinal apical membrane integrity and fluidity
Title | Effects of alcohols on gastric and small intestinal apical membrane integrity and fluidity |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 1988 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://gut.bmjjournals.com/ |
Citation | Gut, 1988, v. 29 n. 12, p. 1648-1655 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Duodenal and jejunal brush border membrane vesicle integrity was studied after in vitro treatment of rabbit tissue with ethyl, benzyl or octyl alcohol. The effects of the alcohols on gastric parietal cell apical and microsomal membrane vesicle integrity was also studied. Membrane vesicle integrity was determined from the enclosed volume of the vesicle preparations, measured as [14C]glucose space at equilibrium. Exposure of vesicles to the three alcohols caused concentration dependent decreases in enclosed volume. The rank order of potency of the alcohols was octyl > benzyl > ethyl. Concentrations ≥10 mM benzyl alcohol significantly reduced the enclosed volume of duodenal or jejunal vesicles; jejunal vesicles were disrupted by 625 mM ethanol, whereas 2 M ethanol was required to disrupt the duodenal vesicles. Gastric apical membrane integrity was reduced with 0.25 M ethanol, the vesicles being approximately an order of magnitude more sensitive to ethanol than gross estimates of gastric mucosal damage, but 1 M ethanol was required to significantly damage gastric microsomes. All concentrations of benzyl or octyl alcohol tested (≥5 mM) reduced the enclosed volume of both gastric apical membrane vesicles and gastric microsomes. As determined by shrink-swell techniques, benzyl alcohol permeated duodenal vesicles at a faster rate than NH4Cl (apparent rate constant of 9.89 (0.71) x 10-3 s-1 compared with 4.48 (0.23) x 10-3 s-1). Therefore, reductions in enclosed volume in response to alcohol treatment could not be explained by alcohol induced osmotic shrinkage. The enclosed volume of the vesicles after alcohol treatment was negatively correlated with membrane fluidity suggesting a common causal effect, the increased fluidity increasing membrane fragility. Duodenal vesicles were more resistant to disruption by the alcohols compared with gastric and jejunal vesicles. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/171527 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 23.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 8.052 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ballard, HJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wilkes, JM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hirst, BH | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-30T06:15:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-30T06:15:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1988 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Gut, 1988, v. 29 n. 12, p. 1648-1655 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0017-5749 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/171527 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Duodenal and jejunal brush border membrane vesicle integrity was studied after in vitro treatment of rabbit tissue with ethyl, benzyl or octyl alcohol. The effects of the alcohols on gastric parietal cell apical and microsomal membrane vesicle integrity was also studied. Membrane vesicle integrity was determined from the enclosed volume of the vesicle preparations, measured as [14C]glucose space at equilibrium. Exposure of vesicles to the three alcohols caused concentration dependent decreases in enclosed volume. The rank order of potency of the alcohols was octyl > benzyl > ethyl. Concentrations ≥10 mM benzyl alcohol significantly reduced the enclosed volume of duodenal or jejunal vesicles; jejunal vesicles were disrupted by 625 mM ethanol, whereas 2 M ethanol was required to disrupt the duodenal vesicles. Gastric apical membrane integrity was reduced with 0.25 M ethanol, the vesicles being approximately an order of magnitude more sensitive to ethanol than gross estimates of gastric mucosal damage, but 1 M ethanol was required to significantly damage gastric microsomes. All concentrations of benzyl or octyl alcohol tested (≥5 mM) reduced the enclosed volume of both gastric apical membrane vesicles and gastric microsomes. As determined by shrink-swell techniques, benzyl alcohol permeated duodenal vesicles at a faster rate than NH4Cl (apparent rate constant of 9.89 (0.71) x 10-3 s-1 compared with 4.48 (0.23) x 10-3 s-1). Therefore, reductions in enclosed volume in response to alcohol treatment could not be explained by alcohol induced osmotic shrinkage. The enclosed volume of the vesicles after alcohol treatment was negatively correlated with membrane fluidity suggesting a common causal effect, the increased fluidity increasing membrane fragility. Duodenal vesicles were more resistant to disruption by the alcohols compared with gastric and jejunal vesicles. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://gut.bmjjournals.com/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Gut | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Alcohols - Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Benzyl Alcohols - Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Duodenum - Ultrastructure | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ethanol - Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Gastric Mucosa - Drug Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Jejunum - Ultrastructure | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Membrane Fluidity - Drug Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Microsomes - Drug Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Microvilli - Drug Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Octanols - Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Parietal Cells, Gastric - Drug Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Rabbits | en_US |
dc.title | Effects of alcohols on gastric and small intestinal apical membrane integrity and fluidity | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ballard, HJ:ballard@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Ballard, HJ=rp00367 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/gut.29.12.1648 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 3220304 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0024223470 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1648 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 1655 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1988R617000006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ballard, HJ=7005286310 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wilkes, JM=7102513233 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hirst, BH=7005256376 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0017-5749 | - |