File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/hed.21033
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-67049100822
- PMID: 19408291
- WOS: WOS:000266541300008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Prospective randomized study of selective neck dissection versus observation for no neck of early tongue carcinoma
Title | Prospective randomized study of selective neck dissection versus observation for no neck of early tongue carcinoma |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Carcinoma Dissection Neck Randomized Tongue |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/38137 |
Citation | Head And Neck, 2009, v. 31 n. 6, p. 765-772 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background. There are controversies on the bene-fits of elective neck dissection (END) for oral tongue carcinoma. Method. This is a prospective randomized study of elective selective I, II, III neck dissection versus observation for N0 neck of stage I to II oral tongue carcinoma. There were 35 patients on the observation arm and 36 patients on the END arm. The main outcome assessment parameters are node-related mortality and disease-specific survival rate. Results. There were 11 patients in the observed arm and 2 patients in the END arm who developed nodal recurrence alone without associated local or distant recurrence. All 13 patients were salvaged, and no patient died of nodal recurrence. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 87% for the observation arm and was 89% for the END arm; the 2% difference was not significant. Conclusion. Observation may be an acceptable alternative to END if strict adherence to a cancer surveillance protocol is followed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/172987 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.034 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yuen, APW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chiu, MH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tam, LC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lap, CT | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wing, YC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, RWM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wei, WI | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chi, KK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kwok, SB | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wai, CY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, AKY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yuen, NWF | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | TrendellSmith, NJ | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yue, WC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, BYH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Li, GKH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, ACW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wai, KH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Sau, YW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yao, TJ | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-30T06:26:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-30T06:26:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Head And Neck, 2009, v. 31 n. 6, p. 765-772 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1043-3074 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/172987 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background. There are controversies on the bene-fits of elective neck dissection (END) for oral tongue carcinoma. Method. This is a prospective randomized study of elective selective I, II, III neck dissection versus observation for N0 neck of stage I to II oral tongue carcinoma. There were 35 patients on the observation arm and 36 patients on the END arm. The main outcome assessment parameters are node-related mortality and disease-specific survival rate. Results. There were 11 patients in the observed arm and 2 patients in the END arm who developed nodal recurrence alone without associated local or distant recurrence. All 13 patients were salvaged, and no patient died of nodal recurrence. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 87% for the observation arm and was 89% for the END arm; the 2% difference was not significant. Conclusion. Observation may be an acceptable alternative to END if strict adherence to a cancer surveillance protocol is followed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/38137 | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Head and Neck | en_HK |
dc.subject | Carcinoma | en_HK |
dc.subject | Dissection | en_HK |
dc.subject | Neck | en_HK |
dc.subject | Randomized | en_HK |
dc.subject | Tongue | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 And Over | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - Mortality - Pathology - Surgery - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Chi-Square Distribution | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Disease-Free Survival | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Follow-Up Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Kaplan-Meier Estimate | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Monitoring, Physiologic - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Neck Dissection - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - Mortality - Pathology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasm Staging | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Observation - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Selection | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reference Values | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Risk Assessment | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Survival Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Tongue Neoplasms - Mortality - Pathology - Surgery - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_US |
dc.title | Prospective randomized study of selective neck dissection versus observation for no neck of early tongue carcinoma | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Wei, WI: hrmswwi@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Yao, TJ: tjyao@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Wei, WI=rp00323 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Yao, TJ=rp00284 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/hed.21033 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19408291 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-67049100822 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 159860 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-67049100822&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 765 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 772 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000266541300008 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.f1000 | 1159795 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yuen, APW=7006290111 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chiu, MH=24775262100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tam, LC=35277784400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lap, CT=55301724400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wing, YC=24777735400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, RWM=7102153861 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wei, WI=7403321552 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chi, KK=35277159700 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kwok, SB=35277262000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wai, CY=35277483700 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, AKY=7403657165 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yuen, NWF=7003697342 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | TrendellSmith, NJ=6602816986 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yue, WC=35277794300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, BYH=7402023295 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Li, GKH=15034790200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ho, ACW=16202695800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wai, KH=6604070073 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Sau, YW=35277666800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yao, TJ=7401886444 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1043-3074 | - |