File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/00207543.2011.631600
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84867085910
- WOS: WOS:000309687700008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The application of workload control in assembly job shops: an assessment by simulation
Title | The application of workload control in assembly job shops: an assessment by simulation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Assembly job shop Customer enquiries Job shop Release methods Workload control |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00207543.asp |
Citation | International Journal of Production Research, 2012, n. 50, p. 5048-5062 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Workload control (WLC) is a production planning and control concept developed to meet the needs of smalland medium-sized make-to-order companies, where a job shop configuration is common. Although simulation has shown WLC can improve job shop performance, field researchers have encountered significant implementation challenges. One of the most notable challenges is the presence of 'assembly job shops' where product structures are more complex than typically modelled in simulation and where the final product consists of several sub-assemblies (or work orders) which have to be co-ordinated. WLC theory has not been developed sufficiently to handle such contexts, and the available literature on assembly job shops is limited. In response, this paper extends the applicability of WLC to assembly job shops by determining the best combination of: (i) WLC due date (DD) setting policy, (ii) release method and (iii) policy for coordinating the progress of work orders. When DDs are predominantly set by the company, the DD setting policy should play the leading role while the role of order release should be limited and the progress of work orders should not be co-ordinated in accordance with the DD of the final product. But when DDs are predominantly specified by customers, the importance of order release as a second workload balancing mechanism increases and work orders should be coordinated by backward scheduling from the DD of the final product. Results indicate that WLC can improve performance in assembly job shops and outperform alternative control policies. Future research should implement these findings in practice. © 2012 Taylor & Francis. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/174119 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.668 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Thürer, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stevenson, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Silva, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, GQ | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-16T03:35:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-16T03:35:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Production Research, 2012, n. 50, p. 5048-5062 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-7543 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/174119 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Workload control (WLC) is a production planning and control concept developed to meet the needs of smalland medium-sized make-to-order companies, where a job shop configuration is common. Although simulation has shown WLC can improve job shop performance, field researchers have encountered significant implementation challenges. One of the most notable challenges is the presence of 'assembly job shops' where product structures are more complex than typically modelled in simulation and where the final product consists of several sub-assemblies (or work orders) which have to be co-ordinated. WLC theory has not been developed sufficiently to handle such contexts, and the available literature on assembly job shops is limited. In response, this paper extends the applicability of WLC to assembly job shops by determining the best combination of: (i) WLC due date (DD) setting policy, (ii) release method and (iii) policy for coordinating the progress of work orders. When DDs are predominantly set by the company, the DD setting policy should play the leading role while the role of order release should be limited and the progress of work orders should not be co-ordinated in accordance with the DD of the final product. But when DDs are predominantly specified by customers, the importance of order release as a second workload balancing mechanism increases and work orders should be coordinated by backward scheduling from the DD of the final product. Results indicate that WLC can improve performance in assembly job shops and outperform alternative control policies. Future research should implement these findings in practice. © 2012 Taylor & Francis. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00207543.asp | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Production Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Assembly job shop | - |
dc.subject | Customer enquiries | - |
dc.subject | Job shop | - |
dc.subject | Release methods | - |
dc.subject | Workload control | - |
dc.title | The application of workload control in assembly job shops: an assessment by simulation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Stevenson, M: m.stevenson@lancaster.ac.uk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Huang, GQ: gqhuang@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Huang, GQ=rp00118 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00207543.2011.631600 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84867085910 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 212382 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 50 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 5048 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 5062 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000309687700008 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0020-7543 | - |