File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.01.021
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-45049085563
- PMID: 18314144
- WOS: WOS:000257816300045
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers
Title | Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Biofouling Degradation products Marine primary producers Water quality guidelines |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul |
Citation | Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2008, v. 57 n. 6-12, p. 575-586 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Irgarol 1051 (2-methythiol-4-tert-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triazine) is an algaecide commonly used in antifouling paints. It undergoes photodegradation which yields M1 (2-methylthio-4-tert-butylamino-6-amino-s-triazine) as its major and most stable degradant. Elevated levels of both Irgarol and M1 have been detected in coastal waters worldwide; however, ecotoxicity effects of M1 to various marine autotrophs such as cyanobacteria are still largely unknown. This study firstly examined and compared the 96 h toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to the cyanobacterium Chroococcus minor and two marine diatom species, Skeletonema costatum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Our results suggested that Irgarol was consistently more toxic to all of the three species than M1 (96 h EC50 values: C. minor, 7.71 μg L-1 Irgarol vs. >200 μg L-1 M1; S. costatum, 0.29 μg L-1 Irgarol vs. 11.32 μg L-1 M1; and T. pseudonana, 0.41 μg L-1 Irgarol vs. 16.50 μg L-1 M1). Secondly, we conducted a meta-analysis of currently available data on toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to both freshwater and marine primary producers based on species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). Interestingly, freshwater autotrophs are more sensitive to Irgarol than their marine counterparts. For marine autotrophs, microalgae are generally more sensitive to Irgarol than macroalgae and cyanobacteria. With very limited available data on M1 (i.e. five species), M1 might be less toxic than Irgarol; nonetheless this finding warrants further confirmation with additional data on other autotrophic species. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/179058 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.445 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, AQ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, KMY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kwok, KWH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bao, VWW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, MHW | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-19T09:51:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-12-19T09:51:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2008, v. 57 n. 6-12, p. 575-586 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-326X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/179058 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Irgarol 1051 (2-methythiol-4-tert-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triazine) is an algaecide commonly used in antifouling paints. It undergoes photodegradation which yields M1 (2-methylthio-4-tert-butylamino-6-amino-s-triazine) as its major and most stable degradant. Elevated levels of both Irgarol and M1 have been detected in coastal waters worldwide; however, ecotoxicity effects of M1 to various marine autotrophs such as cyanobacteria are still largely unknown. This study firstly examined and compared the 96 h toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to the cyanobacterium Chroococcus minor and two marine diatom species, Skeletonema costatum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Our results suggested that Irgarol was consistently more toxic to all of the three species than M1 (96 h EC50 values: C. minor, 7.71 μg L-1 Irgarol vs. >200 μg L-1 M1; S. costatum, 0.29 μg L-1 Irgarol vs. 11.32 μg L-1 M1; and T. pseudonana, 0.41 μg L-1 Irgarol vs. 16.50 μg L-1 M1). Secondly, we conducted a meta-analysis of currently available data on toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to both freshwater and marine primary producers based on species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). Interestingly, freshwater autotrophs are more sensitive to Irgarol than their marine counterparts. For marine autotrophs, microalgae are generally more sensitive to Irgarol than macroalgae and cyanobacteria. With very limited available data on M1 (i.e. five species), M1 might be less toxic than Irgarol; nonetheless this finding warrants further confirmation with additional data on other autotrophic species. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Marine Pollution Bulletin | en_US |
dc.subject | Biofouling | - |
dc.subject | Degradation products | - |
dc.subject | Marine primary producers | - |
dc.subject | Water quality guidelines | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Cyanobacteria - Drug Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Diatoms - Drug Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Disinfectants - Metabolism - Toxicity | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Marine Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Species Specificity | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Triazines - Metabolism - Toxicity | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Water Pollutants, Chemical - Metabolism - Toxicity | en_US |
dc.title | Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, KMY: kmyleung@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Leung, KMY=rp00733 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.01.021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18314144 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-45049085563 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 145412 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-45049085563&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 57 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 575 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 586 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000257816300045 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zhang, AQ=23669449500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Leung, KMY=7401860738 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kwok, KWH=19337480200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Bao, VWW=23666277800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, MHW=7202630175 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0025-326X | - |