File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/14767720903574090
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79956172669
- WOS: WOS:000212251700006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Emerging regulatory regionalism in university governance: A comparative study of China and Taiwan
Title | Emerging regulatory regionalism in university governance: A comparative study of China and Taiwan |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | International Benchmarking Regulatory Regionalism World-Class University |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/14767724.asp |
Citation | Globalisation, Societies And Education, 2010, v. 8 n. 1, p. 87-103 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Well aware of the growing importance of the global university ranking exercises, many governments in East Asia have introduced different strategies to benchmark with leading universities in order to enhance the global competitiveness of their universities. With strong determination to do better in such global ranking exercises, universities in Mainland China and Taiwan have attempted to restructure their university systems and searched for new governance strategies to secure higher global rankings. This article critically examines major policies introduced and strategies employed by governments in Mainland China and Taiwan in benchmarking their universities with world-class universities. Changes taking place in the university governance in China and Taiwan have clearly suggested significant transformations in the regulatory regime whereby broader regulatory objectives are directed to promote economic competitiveness and global ranking. Similarly to its European counterparts, university governance in China and Taiwan is now more global in scope; it is increasingly subject to new external standards of measurement while its own internal governance procedures have become more managerial. The present research has suggested new modes of higher educational governance are emerging in China and Taiwan, characterized by evolving features of 'regulatory regionalism'. © 2010 Taylor & Francis. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/179385 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.887 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mok, KH | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-19T09:55:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-12-19T09:55:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Globalisation, Societies And Education, 2010, v. 8 n. 1, p. 87-103 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1476-7724 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/179385 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Well aware of the growing importance of the global university ranking exercises, many governments in East Asia have introduced different strategies to benchmark with leading universities in order to enhance the global competitiveness of their universities. With strong determination to do better in such global ranking exercises, universities in Mainland China and Taiwan have attempted to restructure their university systems and searched for new governance strategies to secure higher global rankings. This article critically examines major policies introduced and strategies employed by governments in Mainland China and Taiwan in benchmarking their universities with world-class universities. Changes taking place in the university governance in China and Taiwan have clearly suggested significant transformations in the regulatory regime whereby broader regulatory objectives are directed to promote economic competitiveness and global ranking. Similarly to its European counterparts, university governance in China and Taiwan is now more global in scope; it is increasingly subject to new external standards of measurement while its own internal governance procedures have become more managerial. The present research has suggested new modes of higher educational governance are emerging in China and Taiwan, characterized by evolving features of 'regulatory regionalism'. © 2010 Taylor & Francis. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/14767724.asp | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Globalisation, Societies and Education | en_US |
dc.subject | International Benchmarking | en_US |
dc.subject | Regulatory Regionalism | en_US |
dc.subject | World-Class University | en_US |
dc.title | Emerging regulatory regionalism in university governance: A comparative study of China and Taiwan | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Mok, KH: ka-ho.mok@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Mok, KH=rp00603 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14767720903574090 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79956172669 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79956172669&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 87 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 103 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000212251700006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mok, KH=7103141165 | en_US |
dc.customcontrol.immutable | csl 141216 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1476-7724 | - |