File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/jmri.20023
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-1842433643
- PMID: 15065162
- WOS: WOS:000220636800003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of TCA and ICA Techniques in fMRI Data Processing
Title | Comparison of TCA and ICA Techniques in fMRI Data Processing |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Data processing Functional magnetic resonance imaging Independent component analysis (ICA) Magnetic resonance imaging Temporal cluster analysis (TCA) |
Issue Date | 2004 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1053-1807/ |
Citation | Journal Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004, v. 19 n. 4, p. 397-402 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To make a quantitative comparison of temporal cluster analysis (TCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) techniques in detecting brain activation by using simulated data and in vivo event-related functional MRI (fMRI) experiments. Materials and Methods: A single-slice MRI image was replicated 150 times to simulate an fMRI time series. An event-related brain activation pattern with five different levels of intensity and Gaussian noise was superimposed on these images. Maximum contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the signal change ranged from 1.0 to 2.0 by 0.25 increments. In vivo visual stimulation fMRI experiments were performed on a 1.9 T magnet. Six human volunteers participated in this study. All imaging data were analyzed using both TCA and ICA methods. Results: Both simulated and in vivo data have shown that no statistically significant difference exists in the activation areas detected by both ICA and TCA techniques when CNR of fMRI signal is larger than 1.75. Conclusion: TCA and ICA techniques are comparable in generating functional brain maps in event-related fMRI experiments. Although ICA has richer features in exploring the spatial and temporal information of the functional images, the TCA method has advantages in its computational efficiency, repeatability, and readiness to average data from group subjects. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/179503 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.339 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, X | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Glahn, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, LH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Li, N | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Xiong, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gao, JH | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-19T09:58:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-12-19T09:58:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004, v. 19 n. 4, p. 397-402 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1053-1807 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/179503 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To make a quantitative comparison of temporal cluster analysis (TCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) techniques in detecting brain activation by using simulated data and in vivo event-related functional MRI (fMRI) experiments. Materials and Methods: A single-slice MRI image was replicated 150 times to simulate an fMRI time series. An event-related brain activation pattern with five different levels of intensity and Gaussian noise was superimposed on these images. Maximum contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the signal change ranged from 1.0 to 2.0 by 0.25 increments. In vivo visual stimulation fMRI experiments were performed on a 1.9 T magnet. Six human volunteers participated in this study. All imaging data were analyzed using both TCA and ICA methods. Results: Both simulated and in vivo data have shown that no statistically significant difference exists in the activation areas detected by both ICA and TCA techniques when CNR of fMRI signal is larger than 1.75. Conclusion: TCA and ICA techniques are comparable in generating functional brain maps in event-related fMRI experiments. Although ICA has richer features in exploring the spatial and temporal information of the functional images, the TCA method has advantages in its computational efficiency, repeatability, and readiness to average data from group subjects. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1053-1807/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | en_US |
dc.subject | Data processing | - |
dc.subject | Functional magnetic resonance imaging | - |
dc.subject | Independent component analysis (ICA) | - |
dc.subject | Magnetic resonance imaging | - |
dc.subject | Temporal cluster analysis (TCA) | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Brain Mapping | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cluster Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Data Interpretation, Statistical | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Photic Stimulation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Visual Cortex - Physiology | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of TCA and ICA Techniques in fMRI Data Processing | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Tan, LH: tanlh@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Tan, LH=rp01202 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/jmri.20023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15065162 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-1842433643 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842433643&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 397 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 402 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000220636800003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zhao, X=7407577900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Glahn, D=6603114543 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tan, LH=7402233462 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Li, N=36014373300 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Xiong, J=7202010007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Gao, JH=7404475674 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1053-1807 | - |