File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Combating nuisance: Sanitation, speculation and the politics of planning in colonial Hong Kong

TitleCombating nuisance: Sanitation, speculation and the politics of planning in colonial Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherFaculty of Arts, The University of Hong Kong.
Citation
International Research Workshop on "Imperial Contagions: Medicine and Cultures of Planning in Asia, 1880-1949", Hong Kong, 9-11 December 2009 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper explores how discourses of health and sanitation, which had provoked intense public debates amidst growing fear of epidemic outbreaks in Hong Kong in the late nineteenth century, had been reappropriated and constructed anew by different groups of people for specific purposes. By examining a number of controversies over the colonial government’s effort to combat diseases and to improve public health, this paper elucidates some of the underlying tensions in colonial urban development, whereas the entanglement of public and private interests in property had repeated thwarted attempts to implement building regulations and sanitary reform. The comparison of the competing narratives about race, culture and the built environment by colonial administrators, sanitary experts and Chinese and European property owners illustrates not only the malleability of the these categories, but also the ways in which a particular rationality of capitalist development came to be accepted and consolidated under colonial rule.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/182092

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChu, CLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-17T07:21:29Z-
dc.date.available2013-04-17T07:21:29Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Research Workshop on "Imperial Contagions: Medicine and Cultures of Planning in Asia, 1880-1949", Hong Kong, 9-11 December 2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/182092-
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores how discourses of health and sanitation, which had provoked intense public debates amidst growing fear of epidemic outbreaks in Hong Kong in the late nineteenth century, had been reappropriated and constructed anew by different groups of people for specific purposes. By examining a number of controversies over the colonial government’s effort to combat diseases and to improve public health, this paper elucidates some of the underlying tensions in colonial urban development, whereas the entanglement of public and private interests in property had repeated thwarted attempts to implement building regulations and sanitary reform. The comparison of the competing narratives about race, culture and the built environment by colonial administrators, sanitary experts and Chinese and European property owners illustrates not only the malleability of the these categories, but also the ways in which a particular rationality of capitalist development came to be accepted and consolidated under colonial rule.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Arts, The University of Hong Kong.-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Research Workshop on "Imperial Contagions: Medicine and Cultures of Planning in Asia, 1880-1949"en_US
dc.titleCombating nuisance: Sanitation, speculation and the politics of planning in colonial Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailChu, CL: clchu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityChu, CL=rp01708en_US
dc.description.natureabstract-
dc.identifier.hkuros213922en_US
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats