File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00086.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0037716724
- PMID: 12755531
- WOS: WOS:000181651500010
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Use of fetal-pelvic index in the prediction of vaginal birth following previous cesarean section
Title | Use of fetal-pelvic index in the prediction of vaginal birth following previous cesarean section |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Fetal-pelvic index Previous cesarean section Vaginal birth after setion |
Issue Date | 2003 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-JOG.html |
Citation | Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology Research, 2003, v. 29 n. 2, p. 104-108 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Aim: To clarify the usefulness of the fetal-pelvic index as a predictor of vaginal birth after previous lower segment cesarean section. Methods: One hundred and seventy women with one lower segment cesarean section who attempted for trial of vaginal birth were enrolled. Pelvimetry was performed to measure maternal pelvic inlet and mid-cavity circumferences at 37 weeks gestation. Ultrasound was performed to measure fetal head and abdominal circumferences at 38-39 weeks. The fetal-pelvic index was derived. The predictability of fetal-pelvic index in the predicting the outcome of delivery was calculated. Results: Fifty-seven (33.5%) women required repeated cesarean section and 113 (66.5%) delivered vaginally. Twenty-two women with positive fetal-pelvic index had repeated cesarean section. The predictability of positive fetal-pelvic index was 48.9%. Ninety of the 125 patients with a negative fetal-pelvic index delivered vaginally. The predictability of negative fetal-pelvic index was 72.0%. Conclusions: Fetal-pelvic index derived in the antenatal period has low predictive value in predicting of successful vaginal birth after cesa-rean section. This index is not useful in clinical practice. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/184205 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.576 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wong, KS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, AYK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, LHY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, LCH | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-25T03:01:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-06-25T03:01:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology Research, 2003, v. 29 n. 2, p. 104-108 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1341-8076 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/184205 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To clarify the usefulness of the fetal-pelvic index as a predictor of vaginal birth after previous lower segment cesarean section. Methods: One hundred and seventy women with one lower segment cesarean section who attempted for trial of vaginal birth were enrolled. Pelvimetry was performed to measure maternal pelvic inlet and mid-cavity circumferences at 37 weeks gestation. Ultrasound was performed to measure fetal head and abdominal circumferences at 38-39 weeks. The fetal-pelvic index was derived. The predictability of fetal-pelvic index in the predicting the outcome of delivery was calculated. Results: Fifty-seven (33.5%) women required repeated cesarean section and 113 (66.5%) delivered vaginally. Twenty-two women with positive fetal-pelvic index had repeated cesarean section. The predictability of positive fetal-pelvic index was 48.9%. Ninety of the 125 patients with a negative fetal-pelvic index delivered vaginally. The predictability of negative fetal-pelvic index was 72.0%. Conclusions: Fetal-pelvic index derived in the antenatal period has low predictive value in predicting of successful vaginal birth after cesa-rean section. This index is not useful in clinical practice. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-JOG.html | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Fetal-pelvic index | - |
dc.subject | Previous cesarean section | - |
dc.subject | Vaginal birth after setion | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Fetus - Anatomy & Histology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pelvimetry - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pelvis - Anatomy & Histology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ultrasonography, Prenatal | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Vaginal Birth After Cesarean | en_US |
dc.title | Use of fetal-pelvic index in the prediction of vaginal birth following previous cesarean section | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Tang, LCH: lchtang@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Tang, LCH=rp01756 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00086.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 12755531 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0037716724 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037716724&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 104 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 108 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000181651500010 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Australia | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, KS=36341790700 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, AYK=7403147449 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tse, LHY=36891045800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, LCH=7402081111 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1341-8076 | - |