File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/00016340600589636
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33747777789
- PMID: 16929421
- WOS: WOS:000240285000016
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: A randomized control trial
Title | Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: A randomized control trial |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Induction of labor (IOL) Misoprostol Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0412 |
Citation | Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2006, v. 85 n. 9, p. 1128-1133 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective. To compare the efficacy of two different dosages of oral misoprostol (50 and 100μg) with control, in medical induction of labor for patients with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term. Methods. One hundred women with PROM at term were randomized to receive placebo (vitamin B6 50 mg, control), 50μg (treatment group 1), or 100 μg (treatment group 2) of oral misoprostol every 4 h to a maximum of six doses. The main outcome measures included time interval from onset of PROM to delivery, duration of first stage of labor, and occurrence of vaginal delivery within 24 h from PROM. Results. The time intervals from PROM to delivery were significantly reduced in both treatment groups compared to control (control, 25.1±10.5 h; treatment group 1, 14.5±6.2 h; and treatment group 2, 13.0±6.1 h, p <0.0001 for both). The duration of the first stage of labor was significantly shortened only in treatment group 2 compared to control (3.3±2.5 versus 6.2±3.4 h, p = 0.01). Of those who delivered vaginally (93% in treatment group 1 and 97% in treatment group 2), significantly more women delivered within 24 h of PROM in the treatment group compared to the control group (50%, p <0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes amongst the three groups. Conclusions. Oral misoprostol 50 μg every 4 h is safe, cheap, and as effective as 100 μg in reducing the PROM to delivery time interval and labor duration in primiparous women. The same effect is not observed in a multiparous group. © 2006 Taylor & Francis. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/184207 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.384 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, PC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yeo, ELK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, KS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, LCH | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-25T03:01:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-06-25T03:01:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2006, v. 85 n. 9, p. 1128-1133 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0001-6349 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/184207 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective. To compare the efficacy of two different dosages of oral misoprostol (50 and 100μg) with control, in medical induction of labor for patients with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term. Methods. One hundred women with PROM at term were randomized to receive placebo (vitamin B6 50 mg, control), 50μg (treatment group 1), or 100 μg (treatment group 2) of oral misoprostol every 4 h to a maximum of six doses. The main outcome measures included time interval from onset of PROM to delivery, duration of first stage of labor, and occurrence of vaginal delivery within 24 h from PROM. Results. The time intervals from PROM to delivery were significantly reduced in both treatment groups compared to control (control, 25.1±10.5 h; treatment group 1, 14.5±6.2 h; and treatment group 2, 13.0±6.1 h, p <0.0001 for both). The duration of the first stage of labor was significantly shortened only in treatment group 2 compared to control (3.3±2.5 versus 6.2±3.4 h, p = 0.01). Of those who delivered vaginally (93% in treatment group 1 and 97% in treatment group 2), significantly more women delivered within 24 h of PROM in the treatment group compared to the control group (50%, p <0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes amongst the three groups. Conclusions. Oral misoprostol 50 μg every 4 h is safe, cheap, and as effective as 100 μg in reducing the PROM to delivery time interval and labor duration in primiparous women. The same effect is not observed in a multiparous group. © 2006 Taylor & Francis. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0412 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica | en_US |
dc.subject | Induction of labor (IOL) | - |
dc.subject | Misoprostol | - |
dc.subject | Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Administration, Oral | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Delivery, Obstetric | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dose-Response Relationship, Drug | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - Drug Therapy - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Labor Stage, First - Drug Effects - Physiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Labor, Induced - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Misoprostol - Administration & Dosage - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Oxytocics - Administration & Dosage - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Parity | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Placebos | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy Outcome | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Time Factors | en_US |
dc.title | Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: A randomized control trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Tang, LCH: lchtang@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Tang, LCH=rp01756 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00016340600589636 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16929421 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33747777789 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33747777789&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 85 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1128 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 1133 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000240285000016 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cheung, PC=36921275000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yeo, ELK=8139882600 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, KS=36341790700 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, LCH=7402081111 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0001-6349 | - |