File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Class actions in Hong Kong– yes, no, maybe
Title | Class actions in Hong Kong– yes, no, maybe |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Civil procedure Multi-party litigation Class actions Hong Kong |
Issue Date | 2013 |
Publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hku.hk/law/hklj/ |
Citation | Hong Kong Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, p. 217-244 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Although the Civil Justice Reform brought about many changes to the Hong Kong courts, multi-party claims are still governed by rules whose origins are over a hundred years old. In 2006, the Hong Kong Law Reform Commission undertook the task of considering whether a scheme for multi-party litigation should be adopted in Hong Kong and, if so, to make whatever recommendations were needed to bring this into being. The Law Reform Commission eventually proposed the creation of a ‘class action regime’. This proposal has met with a mixed response from the legal profession, industry groups and the wider public. Its fate may soon be decided by a cross-sector working group chaired by the Solicitor General. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/184832 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.3 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.112 |
SSRN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Meggitt, G | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-15T10:12:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-15T10:12:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Hong Kong Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, p. 217-244 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0378-0600 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/184832 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Although the Civil Justice Reform brought about many changes to the Hong Kong courts, multi-party claims are still governed by rules whose origins are over a hundred years old. In 2006, the Hong Kong Law Reform Commission undertook the task of considering whether a scheme for multi-party litigation should be adopted in Hong Kong and, if so, to make whatever recommendations were needed to bring this into being. The Law Reform Commission eventually proposed the creation of a ‘class action regime’. This proposal has met with a mixed response from the legal profession, industry groups and the wider public. Its fate may soon be decided by a cross-sector working group chaired by the Solicitor General. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hku.hk/law/hklj/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Hong Kong Law Journal | en_US |
dc.subject | Civil procedure | - |
dc.subject | Multi-party litigation | - |
dc.subject | Class actions | - |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | - |
dc.title | Class actions in Hong Kong– yes, no, maybe | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Meggitt, G: garym@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Meggitt, G=rp01284 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | postprint | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 215869 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 217 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 244 | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | - |
dc.identifier.ssrn | 2290116 | - |
dc.identifier.hkulrp | 2013/029 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0378-0600 | - |