File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Comparative analysis of three risk assessment models for prostate cancer in the Hong Kong Chinese population
Title | Comparative analysis of three risk assessment models for prostate cancer in the Hong Kong Chinese population |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/ |
Citation | Hong Kong Urological Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 10 November 2013. In BJU International, 2014, v. 113 n. Suppl. S1, p. 6-7 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: To compare the performance of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, Kattan and Stephenson nomograms in a local Chinese population.
Patients & Methods: A total of 287 men from Queen Mary and Tung Wah Hospitals underwent radical prostatectomy from 1998 to 2012 for prostate cancer. Their CAPRA, Kattan and Stephenson scores were calculated by retrospective analysis. Performance of the 3 tests was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index, calibration curves plots, and decision analysis curves construction.
Results: Concordance indices for all three models were favorable in the local Chinese male population. The Stephenson nomogram had the best calibration plot in predicting biochemical free recurrence probability and displayed a better performance across various threshold probabilities in the decision curve analysis.
Conclusion: All three tools showed good discriminatory power with regards to the patients’ risk of biochemical recurrence with favorable concordance indices. Careful use of these assessment tools should guide the treatment options of prostate cancer. |
Description | Oral Presentation |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/193960 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.337 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tsang, CF | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tsu, HLJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, ATL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, EMK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, KL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yiu, MK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-28T06:38:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-28T06:38:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Hong Kong Urological Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 10 November 2013. In BJU International, 2014, v. 113 n. Suppl. S1, p. 6-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1464-4096 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/193960 | - |
dc.description | Oral Presentation | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the performance of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, Kattan and Stephenson nomograms in a local Chinese population. Patients & Methods: A total of 287 men from Queen Mary and Tung Wah Hospitals underwent radical prostatectomy from 1998 to 2012 for prostate cancer. Their CAPRA, Kattan and Stephenson scores were calculated by retrospective analysis. Performance of the 3 tests was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index, calibration curves plots, and decision analysis curves construction. Results: Concordance indices for all three models were favorable in the local Chinese male population. The Stephenson nomogram had the best calibration plot in predicting biochemical free recurrence probability and displayed a better performance across various threshold probabilities in the decision curve analysis. Conclusion: All three tools showed good discriminatory power with regards to the patients’ risk of biochemical recurrence with favorable concordance indices. Careful use of these assessment tools should guide the treatment options of prostate cancer. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | BJU International | en_US |
dc.rights | The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com | - |
dc.title | Comparative analysis of three risk assessment models for prostate cancer in the Hong Kong Chinese population | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Tsu, HLJ: jamestsu@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, KL: hkl218@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Yiu, MK: pmkyiu@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/bju.12606 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 227500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 113 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | Suppl. S1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 7 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1464-4096 | - |