File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84926296918
- WOS: WOS:000330006800005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Who is a Quasi Client?
Title | Who is a Quasi Client? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Solicitors Professional conduct Confidentiality |
Issue Date | 2013 |
Publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hku.hk/law/hklj/ |
Citation | Hong Kong Law Journal, 2013, v. 43 , p. 869-895 How to Cite? |
Abstract | In the nineteenth century case of Taylor v Blacklow, Gaselee J stated that ‘the first duty of an attorney is to keep the secrets of his client’. That duty of confidentiality has been reiterated by the courts in hundreds of cases throughout the common law world in the years since Taylor v Blacklow was decided. Yet, how does the duty arise? Is it dependent upon a formal retainer? Is it owed to those who have not even retained a solicitor’s services? If so, how and when? Is there any substantive difference between true clients and so-called quasi clients for the purposes of confidentiality? The Hong Kong Court of Appeal considered these issues in Allan v Ng Co (a firm). The implications of its conclusions are far from encouraging. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/194993 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.3 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.112 |
SSRN | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Meggitt, G | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-21T06:44:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-02-21T06:44:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Hong Kong Law Journal, 2013, v. 43 , p. 869-895 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0378-0600 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/194993 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In the nineteenth century case of Taylor v Blacklow, Gaselee J stated that ‘the first duty of an attorney is to keep the secrets of his client’. That duty of confidentiality has been reiterated by the courts in hundreds of cases throughout the common law world in the years since Taylor v Blacklow was decided. Yet, how does the duty arise? Is it dependent upon a formal retainer? Is it owed to those who have not even retained a solicitor’s services? If so, how and when? Is there any substantive difference between true clients and so-called quasi clients for the purposes of confidentiality? The Hong Kong Court of Appeal considered these issues in Allan v Ng Co (a firm). The implications of its conclusions are far from encouraging. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.hku.hk/law/hklj/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Hong Kong Law Journal | en_US |
dc.subject | Solicitors | - |
dc.subject | Professional conduct | - |
dc.subject | Confidentiality | - |
dc.title | Who is a Quasi Client? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Meggitt, G: garym@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Meggitt, G=rp01284 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84926296918 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 228094 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 869 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 895 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000330006800005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | - |
dc.identifier.ssrn | 3954028 | - |
dc.identifier.hkulrp | 2022/27 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0378-0600 | - |