File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3290/j.jad.a30755
- PMID: 24179988
- WOS: WOS:000336356400009
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Fiber-reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prostheses with Various Pontics
Title | Fiber-reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prostheses with Various Pontics |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Publisher | Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd |
Citation | Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2014, v. 16 n. 2, p. 161-168 How to Cite? |
Abstract | PURPOSE: To evaluate the load-bearing capacities of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with pontics of various materials and thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inlay preparations for retaining FDPs were made in a polymer phantom model. Seventy-two FDPs with frameworks made of continuous unidirectional glass fibers (everStick C&B) were fabricated. Three different pontic materials were used: glass ceramics, polymer denture teeth, and composite resin. The FDPs were divided into 3 categories based on the occlusal thicknesses of the pontics (2.5 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.0 mm). The framework's vertical positioning varied respectively. Each pontic material category contained 3 groups (n = 8/group). In group 1, pontics were fabricated conventionally with composite resin (G-ӕnial, GC) with one additional transversal fiber reinforcement. In group 2, the pontics were polymer denture teeth (Heraeus- Kulzer). Group 3 had an IPS-Empress CAD pontic (Ivoclar Vivadent) milled using a Cerec CAD/CAM unit. Groups 1 and 2 served as controls. Each FDP was statically loaded from the pontic until initial fracture (IF) and final fracture (FF). Initial-fracture data were collected from the load-deflection graph. RESULTS: ANOVA indicated statistically significant differences between the materials and occlusal thicknesses (p < 0.001). Quadratic analysis demonstrated the highest correlation between the thickness of the pontic and IF and FF values with ceramic pontics (IF: p < 0.001; R2 = 0.880; FF: p < 0.001; R2 = 0.953). CONCLUSION: By increasing the occlusal thickness of the pontic, the load-bearing capacity of the FRC FDPs may be increased. The highest load-bearing capacity was obtained with 4.0 mm thickness in the ceramic pontic. However, with thinner pontics, polymer denture teeth and composite pontics resulted in higher load-bearing values. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/196772 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.793 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Perea, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Matinlinna, JP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tolvanen, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lassila, LV | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vallittu, PK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-29T03:38:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-04-29T03:38:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2014, v. 16 n. 2, p. 161-168 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1461-5185 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/196772 | - |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: To evaluate the load-bearing capacities of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with pontics of various materials and thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inlay preparations for retaining FDPs were made in a polymer phantom model. Seventy-two FDPs with frameworks made of continuous unidirectional glass fibers (everStick C&B) were fabricated. Three different pontic materials were used: glass ceramics, polymer denture teeth, and composite resin. The FDPs were divided into 3 categories based on the occlusal thicknesses of the pontics (2.5 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.0 mm). The framework's vertical positioning varied respectively. Each pontic material category contained 3 groups (n = 8/group). In group 1, pontics were fabricated conventionally with composite resin (G-ӕnial, GC) with one additional transversal fiber reinforcement. In group 2, the pontics were polymer denture teeth (Heraeus- Kulzer). Group 3 had an IPS-Empress CAD pontic (Ivoclar Vivadent) milled using a Cerec CAD/CAM unit. Groups 1 and 2 served as controls. Each FDP was statically loaded from the pontic until initial fracture (IF) and final fracture (FF). Initial-fracture data were collected from the load-deflection graph. RESULTS: ANOVA indicated statistically significant differences between the materials and occlusal thicknesses (p < 0.001). Quadratic analysis demonstrated the highest correlation between the thickness of the pontic and IF and FF values with ceramic pontics (IF: p < 0.001; R2 = 0.880; FF: p < 0.001; R2 = 0.953). CONCLUSION: By increasing the occlusal thickness of the pontic, the load-bearing capacity of the FRC FDPs may be increased. The highest load-bearing capacity was obtained with 4.0 mm thickness in the ceramic pontic. However, with thinner pontics, polymer denture teeth and composite pontics resulted in higher load-bearing values. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Adhesive Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Composite Resins - chemistry | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Materials - chemistry | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Denture Design | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Denture, Partial, Fixed | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Glass - chemistry | - |
dc.title | Fiber-reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prostheses with Various Pontics | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Matinlinna, JP: jpmat@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Matinlinna, JP=rp00052 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3290/j.jad.a30755 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24179988 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 228707 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 228154 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 16 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 168 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000336356400009 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1461-5185 | - |