File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Conference Paper: Dignity at End of Life: An Interpretive-Systemic Framework

TitleDignity at End of Life: An Interpretive-Systemic Framework
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherThe Association for Death Education and Counseling (ADEC).
Citation
The 36th Annual Conference fo the Association for Death Education and Counseling (ADEC 2014), Baltimore, MD., 23-26 April 2014. In Final Program, 2014, p. 98 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study used both “micro” and “meso” levels of inquiries to attain a holistic understanding of dignified end-of-life care in the Hong Kong Chinese context. Through interviews with 18 terminal cancer patients and 18 of their family caregivers, together with four focus groups with 30 key informants involved in a end-of-life care pathway programme, 31 themes that elucidate dignity have been generated. These themes are organized into 9 categories that together have formed the Interpretive-Systemic Framework of Dignity; which highlights the individual, familial and institutional dimensions of dignity, and underscores the socio-political, socio-cultural and socio-spiritual contexts that dignity is embedded. Objectives: 1. Discuss the theoretical and empirical foundation of dignity at end-of-life care in both Western and Chinese societies. 2. Recognize the critical connection between the individual, familial and institutional perspectives for understanding dignified end-of-life care. References: 1. Ho, A.H.Y., Chan, C.L.W., Leung, P.P.Y., Chochinov, H.M., Neimeyer, R.A., Pang, S.M.C., & Tse, D.M.W. (2013). Living and dying with dignity in Chinese society: Perspectives of older palliative care patients in Hong Kong. Age and Aging, 42(4), 455-461. 2. Ho, A.H.Y., Leung, P.P.Y., Tse, D.M.W., Pang, S.M.C., Chochinov, H.M., Neimeyer, N.A. & Chan, C.L.W. (2013). Dignity amidst liminality: Suffering within healing among Chinese terminal cancer patients. Death Studies, 37, 953-970. 3. Chan, C.L.W., Ho, A.H.Y., Leung, P.P.Y., Chochinov, H.M., Neimeyer, N.A., Pang, S.M.C., & D.M.W Tse. (2012). The blessing and curses of filial piety on dignity at the end-oflife: Lived experience of Hong Kong Chinese Adult Children Caregivers. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 21: 277-296. 3. Utilize an interpretive-systemic framework that emphazises the socio-political, socio-cultural and socio-spiritual structures of society for promoting living and dying with dignity.
DescriptionConference Theme: Riding the Dragon: End of Life and Grief as a Path to Resilience, Transformation and Compassion
Concurrent Session XI: Research Report – 60 minutes
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205507

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo, AHYen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, CLWen_US
dc.contributor.authorChow, AYMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-20T02:59:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-20T02:59:05Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 36th Annual Conference fo the Association for Death Education and Counseling (ADEC 2014), Baltimore, MD., 23-26 April 2014. In Final Program, 2014, p. 98en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205507-
dc.descriptionConference Theme: Riding the Dragon: End of Life and Grief as a Path to Resilience, Transformation and Compassion-
dc.descriptionConcurrent Session XI: Research Report – 60 minutes-
dc.description.abstractThis study used both “micro” and “meso” levels of inquiries to attain a holistic understanding of dignified end-of-life care in the Hong Kong Chinese context. Through interviews with 18 terminal cancer patients and 18 of their family caregivers, together with four focus groups with 30 key informants involved in a end-of-life care pathway programme, 31 themes that elucidate dignity have been generated. These themes are organized into 9 categories that together have formed the Interpretive-Systemic Framework of Dignity; which highlights the individual, familial and institutional dimensions of dignity, and underscores the socio-political, socio-cultural and socio-spiritual contexts that dignity is embedded. Objectives: 1. Discuss the theoretical and empirical foundation of dignity at end-of-life care in both Western and Chinese societies. 2. Recognize the critical connection between the individual, familial and institutional perspectives for understanding dignified end-of-life care. References: 1. Ho, A.H.Y., Chan, C.L.W., Leung, P.P.Y., Chochinov, H.M., Neimeyer, R.A., Pang, S.M.C., & Tse, D.M.W. (2013). Living and dying with dignity in Chinese society: Perspectives of older palliative care patients in Hong Kong. Age and Aging, 42(4), 455-461. 2. Ho, A.H.Y., Leung, P.P.Y., Tse, D.M.W., Pang, S.M.C., Chochinov, H.M., Neimeyer, N.A. & Chan, C.L.W. (2013). Dignity amidst liminality: Suffering within healing among Chinese terminal cancer patients. Death Studies, 37, 953-970. 3. Chan, C.L.W., Ho, A.H.Y., Leung, P.P.Y., Chochinov, H.M., Neimeyer, N.A., Pang, S.M.C., & D.M.W Tse. (2012). The blessing and curses of filial piety on dignity at the end-oflife: Lived experience of Hong Kong Chinese Adult Children Caregivers. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 21: 277-296. 3. Utilize an interpretive-systemic framework that emphazises the socio-political, socio-cultural and socio-spiritual structures of society for promoting living and dying with dignity.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherThe Association for Death Education and Counseling (ADEC).-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Conference fo the Association for Death Education and Counseling, ADEC 2014en_US
dc.titleDignity at End of Life: An Interpretive-Systemic Frameworken_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailHo, AHY: andyho@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailChan, CLW: cecichan@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailChow, AYM: chowamy@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityHo, AHY=rp00650en_US
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CLW=rp00579en_US
dc.identifier.authorityChow, AYM=rp00623en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros235992en_US
dc.identifier.spage98-
dc.identifier.epage98-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats