File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305661
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84921553217
- PMID: 25138756
- WOS: WOS:000348285500014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Sequential therapy with ranibizumab and dexamethasone intravitreal implant is better than dexamethasone monotherapy for macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion
Title | Sequential therapy with ranibizumab and dexamethasone intravitreal implant is better than dexamethasone monotherapy for macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, v. 99 n. 2, p. 210-214 How to Cite? |
Abstract | PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with ranibizumab followed by dexamethasone intravitreal implant compared with dexamethasone monotherapy for macular oedema (MO) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: In this retrospective interventional study, the medical records of subjects with MO due to RVO who received either ranibizumab followed by dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Group 1) or dexamethasone-implant monotherapy (Group 2) were included. Primary outcome was the proportion of subjects who exhibited best-corrected visual acuity (VA) gain and resolution of MO within 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-three eyes were included (17 in Group 1, 16 in Group 2). More subjects in Group 1 exhibited a VA gain of at least 0.5 (LogMAR units hereafter) than Group 2 (29% vs 0%, p=0.044). The speed of VA gain was greater in Group 1 (1.4+/-0.8 months vs 2.7+/-1.4 months, p=0.020). MO was controlled in more subjects in Group 1 at all measured time intervals, and this difference was statistically significant at 3 months and 4 months. Subjects with branch RVO experienced VA gain more rapidly if they were from Group 1 (p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential therapy was found to be more effective than dexamethasone monotherapy in treating MO due to RVO. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/208471 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.862 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Iu, LP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, IY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fung, NSK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, WYJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, RL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chong, V | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, IY | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-11T07:06:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-03-11T07:06:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, v. 99 n. 2, p. 210-214 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1468-2079 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/208471 | - |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with ranibizumab followed by dexamethasone intravitreal implant compared with dexamethasone monotherapy for macular oedema (MO) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: In this retrospective interventional study, the medical records of subjects with MO due to RVO who received either ranibizumab followed by dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Group 1) or dexamethasone-implant monotherapy (Group 2) were included. Primary outcome was the proportion of subjects who exhibited best-corrected visual acuity (VA) gain and resolution of MO within 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-three eyes were included (17 in Group 1, 16 in Group 2). More subjects in Group 1 exhibited a VA gain of at least 0.5 (LogMAR units hereafter) than Group 2 (29% vs 0%, p=0.044). The speed of VA gain was greater in Group 1 (1.4+/-0.8 months vs 2.7+/-1.4 months, p=0.020). MO was controlled in more subjects in Group 1 at all measured time intervals, and this difference was statistically significant at 3 months and 4 months. Subjects with branch RVO experienced VA gain more rapidly if they were from Group 1 (p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential therapy was found to be more effective than dexamethasone monotherapy in treating MO due to RVO. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | British Journal of Ophthalmology | en_US |
dc.title | Sequential therapy with ranibizumab and dexamethasone intravitreal implant is better than dexamethasone monotherapy for macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lee, WYJ: jackylee@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lee, WYJ=rp01498 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305661 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 25138756 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84921553217 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 233165 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 99 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 210 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 214 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000348285500014 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0007-1161 | - |