File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/0014524609103465
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-63849338697
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: What did John 'see and believe' in the tomb? Countless Easter sermons and many Bible commentators may have got it wrong
Title | What did John 'see and believe' in the tomb? Countless Easter sermons and many Bible commentators may have got it wrong |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Burial cloths Easter Empty tomb Johannine witness Resurrection |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Sage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=106688 |
Citation | The Expository Times, 2009, v. 120 n. 7, p. 322-326 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This article examines the varying interpretations of John 20:6–9. There is a 1,600-year division of opinion
on the subject, with eminent figures in church history on opposing sides of the issue. Simply put, the two
interpretations are (1) the mundane, that the evangelist believed what the women had said (the body was removed); or (2) the miraculous, that he believed Christ had risen from the dead. In the last two centuries, opinion has shifted significantly away from the mundane interpretation, due in part to a misunderstanding or mistranslation of the terms used for burial cloths. The author argues that the mundane is more consistent with the wording, the style of the gospel, and the relevant passages in Luke. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/208508 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.111 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Meacham, W | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-11T08:32:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-03-11T08:32:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Expository Times, 2009, v. 120 n. 7, p. 322-326 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0014-5246 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/208508 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article examines the varying interpretations of John 20:6–9. There is a 1,600-year division of opinion on the subject, with eminent figures in church history on opposing sides of the issue. Simply put, the two interpretations are (1) the mundane, that the evangelist believed what the women had said (the body was removed); or (2) the miraculous, that he believed Christ had risen from the dead. In the last two centuries, opinion has shifted significantly away from the mundane interpretation, due in part to a misunderstanding or mistranslation of the terms used for burial cloths. The author argues that the mundane is more consistent with the wording, the style of the gospel, and the relevant passages in Luke. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=106688 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Expository Times | - |
dc.rights | The Expository Times. Copyright © Sage Publications Ltd. | - |
dc.subject | Burial cloths | - |
dc.subject | Easter | - |
dc.subject | Empty tomb | - |
dc.subject | Johannine witness | - |
dc.subject | Resurrection | - |
dc.title | What did John 'see and believe' in the tomb? Countless Easter sermons and many Bible commentators may have got it wrong | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Meacham, W: wfmeacham@gmail.com | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0014524609103465 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-63849338697 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 120 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 322 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 326 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0014-5246 | - |