File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s10845-013-0797-z
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84925292286
- WOS: WOS:000351138700014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Choosing reverse channels under collection responsibility sharing in a closed-loop supply chain with re-manufacturing
Title | Choosing reverse channels under collection responsibility sharing in a closed-loop supply chain with re-manufacturing |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Closed-loop supply chain Collection responsibility sharing Re-manufacturing Reverse collection channels |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2015, v. 26 n. 2, p. 387-402 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This paper considers a closed-loop supply chain with re-manufacturing consisting of retailers, manufacturers and third-party logistics service providers; all participating in the product recycling responsibilities. The effectiveness of methods that can be used to share responsibilities amongst these parties is quantified using different reverse channels. First, re-manufacturing models with three different reverse channels for retailer collection, manufacturer collection and third-party collection are developed using collection responsibility sharing. Next, by comparing these models with the case of no collection responsibility sharing, the effectiveness of responsibility sharing is analysed and quantified. The results for the three models support the following conclusions: (i) from the point of view of the retailer, third-party collection is always the worst choice; (ii) the choice between retailer collection and manufacturer collection depends on the cost parameter representing the resources required in performing the reverse collection tasks; (iii) from the point of view the manufacturer, when the value of the cost parameter is small, collection by manufacturer is the best choice; retailer collection will be best for high values of the cost parameter. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/208689 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.071 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Shi, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nie, JJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Qu, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, LK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sculli, D | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-18T09:04:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-03-18T09:04:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2015, v. 26 n. 2, p. 387-402 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0956-5515 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/208689 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper considers a closed-loop supply chain with re-manufacturing consisting of retailers, manufacturers and third-party logistics service providers; all participating in the product recycling responsibilities. The effectiveness of methods that can be used to share responsibilities amongst these parties is quantified using different reverse channels. First, re-manufacturing models with three different reverse channels for retailer collection, manufacturer collection and third-party collection are developed using collection responsibility sharing. Next, by comparing these models with the case of no collection responsibility sharing, the effectiveness of responsibility sharing is analysed and quantified. The results for the three models support the following conclusions: (i) from the point of view of the retailer, third-party collection is always the worst choice; (ii) the choice between retailer collection and manufacturer collection depends on the cost parameter representing the resources required in performing the reverse collection tasks; (iii) from the point of view the manufacturer, when the value of the cost parameter is small, collection by manufacturer is the best choice; retailer collection will be best for high values of the cost parameter. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing | en_US |
dc.subject | Closed-loop supply chain | - |
dc.subject | Collection responsibility sharing | - |
dc.subject | Re-manufacturing | - |
dc.subject | Reverse collection channels | - |
dc.title | Choosing reverse channels under collection responsibility sharing in a closed-loop supply chain with re-manufacturing | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Qu, T: quting@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Chu, LK: lkchu@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Sculli, D: hreidsc@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10845-013-0797-z | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84925292286 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 242588 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-8145 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000351138700014 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0956-5515 | - |