File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Responsive justice in China during Transitional Times: revisiting the juggling path between Adjudicatory and Mediatory Justice

TitleResponsive justice in China during Transitional Times: revisiting the juggling path between Adjudicatory and Mediatory Justice
Authors
Issue Date2014
Citation
The 9th Annual Conference of the European China Law Studies Association (ECLS 2014), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 15‐16 November 2014. How to Cite?
AbstractChina has been discussed in international literatures as a transitional state in social and economic sense. Literatures are however scant in analyzing how China’s justice system responds to the country’s social and economic transitions. This Article studies the international “transitional justice” framework, which examines justice system in economic, societal, and political transitions in post‐Communism Central and East European (CEE) jurisdictions. Although China is not a transition state in political sense, the transitional justice studies, particularly the analyses on how successor regimes in CEE countries deal with the aftermath of economic restructuring and societal reparations through justice system, is of relevance to Chinese ongoing judicial reform and its future development. By comparing judicial situations in China to the CEE countries during transitional times, this Article attempts to analyze China’s distinctive justice response to her massive economic and societal transformation, so as to conceptualize “responsive justice” in China during transitional times.
DescriptionSession 10: Judges as Legislators?
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/211590

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGu, W-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-21T02:04:01Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-21T02:04:01Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationThe 9th Annual Conference of the European China Law Studies Association (ECLS 2014), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 15‐16 November 2014.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/211590-
dc.descriptionSession 10: Judges as Legislators?-
dc.description.abstractChina has been discussed in international literatures as a transitional state in social and economic sense. Literatures are however scant in analyzing how China’s justice system responds to the country’s social and economic transitions. This Article studies the international “transitional justice” framework, which examines justice system in economic, societal, and political transitions in post‐Communism Central and East European (CEE) jurisdictions. Although China is not a transition state in political sense, the transitional justice studies, particularly the analyses on how successor regimes in CEE countries deal with the aftermath of economic restructuring and societal reparations through justice system, is of relevance to Chinese ongoing judicial reform and its future development. By comparing judicial situations in China to the CEE countries during transitional times, this Article attempts to analyze China’s distinctive justice response to her massive economic and societal transformation, so as to conceptualize “responsive justice” in China during transitional times.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Conference of the European China Law Studies Association, ECLS 2014-
dc.titleResponsive justice in China during Transitional Times: revisiting the juggling path between Adjudicatory and Mediatory Justice-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailGu, W: guweixia@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGu, W=rp01249-
dc.identifier.hkuros245555-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats