File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Innovative Measurement of Spatial Segregation: Comparative evidence from Hong Kong and San Francisco

TitleInnovative Measurement of Spatial Segregation: Comparative evidence from Hong Kong and San Francisco
Authors
KeywordsSegregation
Spatial analysis
Income inequality
Urban spatial structure
Hong Kong
China
Issue Date2014
PublisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/regec
Citation
Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2014, v. 47, p. 99-111 How to Cite?
AbstractThe spatial distribution of households of different socioeconomic groups in urban areas has drawn longstanding attention from scholars because residential location patterns have important impacts on social outcomes and the economic efficiency of cities. Recent comparative work on this topic has yielded some insight into the causes and consequences of segregation patterns, but much of this comparison is indirect. An explicitly spatial version of the entropy index has recently been developed that facilitates comparison, as it allows for the disaggregation of segregation levels by scale and income (Reardon and O'Sullivan, 2004; Reardon, 2009; Reardon and Bischoff, 2011). This paper applies these new measurement techniques to two metropolises; Hong Kong and San Francisco. Although overall segregation levels are similar, the shape of the segregation profile across geographic scales and the income distribution is quite different. The paper also includes a script for calculating spatial ordinal segregation indices in ArcGIS.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/215010
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.412
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMonkkonen, P-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, X-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-21T12:19:20Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-21T12:19:20Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationRegional Science and Urban Economics, 2014, v. 47, p. 99-111-
dc.identifier.issn0166-0462-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/215010-
dc.description.abstractThe spatial distribution of households of different socioeconomic groups in urban areas has drawn longstanding attention from scholars because residential location patterns have important impacts on social outcomes and the economic efficiency of cities. Recent comparative work on this topic has yielded some insight into the causes and consequences of segregation patterns, but much of this comparison is indirect. An explicitly spatial version of the entropy index has recently been developed that facilitates comparison, as it allows for the disaggregation of segregation levels by scale and income (Reardon and O'Sullivan, 2004; Reardon, 2009; Reardon and Bischoff, 2011). This paper applies these new measurement techniques to two metropolises; Hong Kong and San Francisco. Although overall segregation levels are similar, the shape of the segregation profile across geographic scales and the income distribution is quite different. The paper also includes a script for calculating spatial ordinal segregation indices in ArcGIS.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/regec-
dc.relation.ispartofRegional Science and Urban Economics-
dc.subjectSegregation-
dc.subjectSpatial analysis-
dc.subjectIncome inequality-
dc.subjectUrban spatial structure-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.titleInnovative Measurement of Spatial Segregation: Comparative evidence from Hong Kong and San Francisco-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, X: zhangxh@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityZhang, X=rp02816-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.09.016-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84906940822-
dc.identifier.hkuros249999-
dc.identifier.volume47-
dc.identifier.spage99-
dc.identifier.epage111-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000342872400010-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats