File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Open access repositories in the Asia-Oceania region: Experiences and guidelines from three academic institutions

TitleOpen access repositories in the Asia-Oceania region: Experiences and guidelines from three academic institutions
Authors
KeywordsAsia
Australia
Hong Kong
institutional repository
Malaysia
Oceania
Open access
Issue Date2015
PublisherSage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=106658
Citation
IFLA Journal, 2015, v. 41 n. 2, p. 162-176 How to Cite?
AbstractIn recent years open access models have transcended traditional modes of publishing, thus enabling freer access to research. This paper takes a trans-regional approach to open access publishing in the Asia and Oceania region focussing on individual institutions in three countries – Charles Darwin University (Australia), University of Hong Kong and the University of Malaya, reflecting on how each one is rising, in its own individual way, to meet the range of challenges that its research communities are facing. Specifically, it focuses on open access and institutional repository development, and traces their development at each of the aforementioned institutions. This paper is based on interviews conducted with staff involved with the development of the repository, and the open access collection in particular, at each of the three institutions. It synthesises open access developments and reviews the role the library has played in each institution in the development of open access across the academic and research community; and the success that has been achieved to date. It highlights any common factors between the approaches taken by each institution, as well as any significant differences of note. The findings reveal that each of the three institutions is at a different stage of development with the University of Hong Kong repository ranked at the top within Asia. Each has used a slightly different approach toward open access, and used different software to develop their repository. The authors have collated the overall experiences of each institution in open access publishing and repository development. They have highlighted the successes and failures that each has experienced and formulated a set of guidelines that may help those embarking on establishing an open access repository.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/219103
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.538
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMamtora, J-
dc.contributor.authorYang, T-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, D-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-18T07:13:08Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-18T07:13:08Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationIFLA Journal, 2015, v. 41 n. 2, p. 162-176-
dc.identifier.issn0340-0352-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/219103-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years open access models have transcended traditional modes of publishing, thus enabling freer access to research. This paper takes a trans-regional approach to open access publishing in the Asia and Oceania region focussing on individual institutions in three countries – Charles Darwin University (Australia), University of Hong Kong and the University of Malaya, reflecting on how each one is rising, in its own individual way, to meet the range of challenges that its research communities are facing. Specifically, it focuses on open access and institutional repository development, and traces their development at each of the aforementioned institutions. This paper is based on interviews conducted with staff involved with the development of the repository, and the open access collection in particular, at each of the three institutions. It synthesises open access developments and reviews the role the library has played in each institution in the development of open access across the academic and research community; and the success that has been achieved to date. It highlights any common factors between the approaches taken by each institution, as well as any significant differences of note. The findings reveal that each of the three institutions is at a different stage of development with the University of Hong Kong repository ranked at the top within Asia. Each has used a slightly different approach toward open access, and used different software to develop their repository. The authors have collated the overall experiences of each institution in open access publishing and repository development. They have highlighted the successes and failures that each has experienced and formulated a set of guidelines that may help those embarking on establishing an open access repository.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=106658-
dc.relation.ispartofIFLA Journal-
dc.rightsIFLA Journal. Copyright © Sage Publications Ltd.-
dc.subjectAsia-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjectinstitutional repository-
dc.subjectMalaysia-
dc.subjectOceania-
dc.subjectOpen access-
dc.titleOpen access repositories in the Asia-Oceania region: Experiences and guidelines from three academic institutions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYang, T: yangta@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYang, T=rp01977-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0340035215582219-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84930591740-
dc.identifier.hkuros250727-
dc.identifier.volume41-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage162-
dc.identifier.epage176-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000438385000008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0340-0352-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats