File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Hysterectomy for abnormal cervical smear when local excision is not possible

TitleHysterectomy for abnormal cervical smear when local excision is not possible
Authors
Keywordscervical cancer
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
hysterectomy
Issue Date2014
PublisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jlgtd.com
Citation
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2014, v. 18 n. 3, p. 235-239 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To review the outcomes of those women who underwent hysterectomy because of an abnormal cervical smear where local excision was considered technically not possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all women who had hysterectomy at a university-affiliated hospital, carried out during the period between January 2000 and June 2012, because of cervical neoplasia. RESULTS: Fifty-six women were identified. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of the women at the time of hysterectomy was 61.4 (8.2) years. Two women (3.6%) had cervical carcinoma, and adjuvant treatment was required in both cases. Being postmenopausal and older than 50 years and having a history of previous local excisional procedure were associated with a higher risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia found during hysterectomy (p > .005). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 42.3 (30.8) months after hysterectomy, 35.7% of women had persistent cytologic abnormality after hysterectomy, with 19.6% having subsequent histologically proven vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN). Women's age, route of hysterectomy, previous local excision, degree of cytologic abnormality before hysterectomy, presence of VAIN before hysterectomy, and final histology of the hysterectomy specimen could not predict subsequent VAIN after hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy seems to be an appropriate option in management, but further surgery or adjuvant therapy may be needed. Women should also be aware of the possibilities of persistent cytologic abnormalities including VAIN, but unfortunately, no predictive factor for its occurrence can be identified.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/219189
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.972
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, KW-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, VYT-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-18T07:16:54Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-18T07:16:54Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2014, v. 18 n. 3, p. 235-239-
dc.identifier.issn1089-2591-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/219189-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To review the outcomes of those women who underwent hysterectomy because of an abnormal cervical smear where local excision was considered technically not possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all women who had hysterectomy at a university-affiliated hospital, carried out during the period between January 2000 and June 2012, because of cervical neoplasia. RESULTS: Fifty-six women were identified. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of the women at the time of hysterectomy was 61.4 (8.2) years. Two women (3.6%) had cervical carcinoma, and adjuvant treatment was required in both cases. Being postmenopausal and older than 50 years and having a history of previous local excisional procedure were associated with a higher risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia found during hysterectomy (p > .005). During a mean (SD) follow-up of 42.3 (30.8) months after hysterectomy, 35.7% of women had persistent cytologic abnormality after hysterectomy, with 19.6% having subsequent histologically proven vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN). Women's age, route of hysterectomy, previous local excision, degree of cytologic abnormality before hysterectomy, presence of VAIN before hysterectomy, and final histology of the hysterectomy specimen could not predict subsequent VAIN after hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy seems to be an appropriate option in management, but further surgery or adjuvant therapy may be needed. Women should also be aware of the possibilities of persistent cytologic abnormalities including VAIN, but unfortunately, no predictive factor for its occurrence can be identified.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jlgtd.com-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease-
dc.subjectcervical cancer-
dc.subjectcervical intraepithelial neoplasia-
dc.subjecthysterectomy-
dc.titleHysterectomy for abnormal cervical smear when local excision is not possible-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, KW: kawang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, VYT: vytc@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, VYT=rp01323-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182a42d33-
dc.identifier.pmid24270199-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84903820396-
dc.identifier.hkuros253811-
dc.identifier.volume18-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage235-
dc.identifier.epage239-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000338030900009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl1089-2591-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats