File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Bringing Politics Back In: Access to Justice and Labor Dispute Resolution in China

TitleBringing Politics Back In: Access to Justice and Labor Dispute Resolution in China
Authors
KeywordsAccess to Justice
Legality
Collective Bargaining
Strike
Unions
Issue Date2017
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Bringing Politics Back In: Access to Justice and Labour Dispute Resolution in China. In Sapio, F, Trevaskes, S, Biddulph, S, et al. (Eds.), Justice: The China Experience, p. 356-378. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractA neglected aspect in the global promotion of rule of law is the political nature of the rule of law. While scholars and practitioners in the field have debated the necessity and feasibility of worldwide rule of law (McCubbins, Rodriguez and Weingast, 2010; Weingast, 2008), they tend to focus on whether, or the degree to which, a developing country meets the “doorstep conditions” for the rule of law as defined in the West. The literature in general marginalizes the political use of law when it is applied in the developing world. In a sense, law is purposively regarded as a technical governance tool, and the politics of rule of law is intentionally taken out of the equation in academic and policy considerations. This chapter uses labor dispute resolution in China as an example to study access to justice in China’s social and economic transition. The principal argument is that the legal approach to access to justice, with a sharp focus on law and courts, is narrow and fails to explain the wider political horizon on which justice is defined and redefined according to the prevailing sense of justice and the political economy that shapes it. In doing so, this chapter brings politics back to the over-legalized concept of access to justice. The chapter first explores the background in which legal justice emerges in China, and then examines the dominant features of access to justice as it is understood and implemented in China.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/227063
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFu, H-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-18T03:31:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-18T03:31:31Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationBringing Politics Back In: Access to Justice and Labour Dispute Resolution in China. In Sapio, F, Trevaskes, S, Biddulph, S, et al. (Eds.), Justice: The China Experience, p. 356-378. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/227063-
dc.description.abstractA neglected aspect in the global promotion of rule of law is the political nature of the rule of law. While scholars and practitioners in the field have debated the necessity and feasibility of worldwide rule of law (McCubbins, Rodriguez and Weingast, 2010; Weingast, 2008), they tend to focus on whether, or the degree to which, a developing country meets the “doorstep conditions” for the rule of law as defined in the West. The literature in general marginalizes the political use of law when it is applied in the developing world. In a sense, law is purposively regarded as a technical governance tool, and the politics of rule of law is intentionally taken out of the equation in academic and policy considerations. This chapter uses labor dispute resolution in China as an example to study access to justice in China’s social and economic transition. The principal argument is that the legal approach to access to justice, with a sharp focus on law and courts, is narrow and fails to explain the wider political horizon on which justice is defined and redefined according to the prevailing sense of justice and the political economy that shapes it. In doing so, this chapter brings politics back to the over-legalized concept of access to justice. The chapter first explores the background in which legal justice emerges in China, and then examines the dominant features of access to justice as it is understood and implemented in China.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofJustice: The China Experience-
dc.rightsThis material has been published in revised form in Justice: The China Experience edited by Sapio, F, Trevaskes, S, Biddulph, S, et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108115919.013. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © Cambridge University Press 2017-
dc.subjectAccess to Justice-
dc.subjectLegality-
dc.subjectCollective Bargaining-
dc.subjectStrike-
dc.subjectUnions-
dc.titleBringing Politics Back In: Access to Justice and Labor Dispute Resolution in China-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailFu, H: hlfu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityFu, H=rp01245-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/9781108115919.013-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85046858319-
dc.identifier.spage356-
dc.identifier.epage378-
dc.publisher.placeCambridge-
dc.identifier.ssrn2791589-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats