File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.004
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84920193712
- WOS: WOS:000348487000010
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Why recommend a brand face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional word-of-mouth
Title | Why recommend a brand face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional word-of-mouth |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Self-enhancement need Social media Social risk Word-of-mouth |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2015, v. 25, n. 1, p. 120-128 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We examine the conceptual difference between consumer electronic word-of-mouth on online social sites (sWOM) such as Facebook and traditional face-to-face word-of-mouth (WOM). We find that consumers are less willing to engage in sWOM than WOM. Such a difference in willingness to offer word-of-mouth can be explained by social risk associated with different communication modes. We show that the difference between people's desire to engage in sWOM and WOM is mediated by perceived social risk and amplified when social risk is made salient. Furthermore, we show that consumers' need to self-enhance mitigates the difference in willingness to offer sWOM versus WOM. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/228207 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.531 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Eisingerich, AB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chun, HH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jia, HM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bell, SJ | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-01T06:45:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-01T06:45:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2015, v. 25, n. 1, p. 120-128 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1057-7408 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/228207 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We examine the conceptual difference between consumer electronic word-of-mouth on online social sites (sWOM) such as Facebook and traditional face-to-face word-of-mouth (WOM). We find that consumers are less willing to engage in sWOM than WOM. Such a difference in willingness to offer word-of-mouth can be explained by social risk associated with different communication modes. We show that the difference between people's desire to engage in sWOM and WOM is mediated by perceived social risk and amplified when social risk is made salient. Furthermore, we show that consumers' need to self-enhance mitigates the difference in willingness to offer sWOM versus WOM. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Consumer Psychology | - |
dc.subject | Self-enhancement need | - |
dc.subject | Social media | - |
dc.subject | Social risk | - |
dc.subject | Word-of-mouth | - |
dc.title | Why recommend a brand face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional word-of-mouth | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.004 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84920193712 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 294075 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 25 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 120 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 128 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000348487000010 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1057-7408 | - |