File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Effect of denosumab on bone mineral density in patients with prior bisphosphonate exposure

TitleEffect of denosumab on bone mineral density in patients with prior bisphosphonate exposure
Authors
Issue Date2016
PublisherSpringer UK. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/orthopedics/journal/198
Citation
The 16th World Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (WCO-IOF-ESCEO 2016), Malaga, Spain, 14–17 April 2016. In Osteoporosis International, 2016, v. 27 n. Suppl. 1, p. S316, abstract no. P565 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: It has been demonstrate that denosumab can effectively improve the BMD of patients with short-term (6 months) exposure of oral bisphosphonate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in BMD after switching to denosumab for one year in patients with prior oral bisphosphonate use for a longer duration. Material and Methods: Patients with osteoporosis were followed according to a standard protocol. Patients using denosumab for more than one year, with history of bisphosphonate exposure for at least one year, were recruited for analysis. Patients were monitored regularly in nurse-led clinic to ensure good drug adherence. Subcutaneous denosumab injection was administered by nurses as outpatient. BMD was measured by DXA scan. All subjects had adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The BMD of the total spine, neck of femur and total hip before and after commencement of denosumab was compared by dependent T-test. Results: 104 female subjects with a mean age of 73.7 ± 10.5 years were included in this report. All of the subjects had history of fragility fracture. Duration of oral bisphosphonate exposure before switching to denosumab was 4.5 ± 2.7 years. The oral bisphosphonate used was alendronate 70 mg once weekly. There was no statistically significant difference observed in BMD of the total spine (0.655 ± 0.105 vs. 0.662 ± 0.107 g/cm2 , p= 0.24), neck of femur (0.485 ± 0.080 vs. 0.480 ± 0.080 g/cm2 , P= 0.30) and total hip (0.589 ± 0.109 vs. 0.598 ± 0.112 g/cm2 , p= 0.09) before and 1 year after initiation of denosumab. Conclusions: Patients with prevalent fragility fracture, despite having relatively long history of bisphosphonate exposure, should be benefited by continuation of anti-osteoporosis treatment because of high fracture risk. However, switching this group of patients to denosumab may not reproduce the similar BMD improvement observed in patients who had taken bisphosphonate for short term. However, the efficacy of denosumab in fracture risk reduction in this group of patients needs further evaluation.
DescriptionPoster Abstracts
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/229852
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.111

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWoo, YC-
dc.contributor.authorLoong, CH-
dc.contributor.authorChau, WK-
dc.contributor.authorLam, KYJ-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, MAM-
dc.contributor.authorLee, CHP-
dc.contributor.authorLee, AC-
dc.contributor.authorTan, KCB-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-23T14:13:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-23T14:13:38Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThe 16th World Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (WCO-IOF-ESCEO 2016), Malaga, Spain, 14–17 April 2016. In Osteoporosis International, 2016, v. 27 n. Suppl. 1, p. S316, abstract no. P565-
dc.identifier.issn0937-941X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/229852-
dc.descriptionPoster Abstracts-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: It has been demonstrate that denosumab can effectively improve the BMD of patients with short-term (6 months) exposure of oral bisphosphonate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in BMD after switching to denosumab for one year in patients with prior oral bisphosphonate use for a longer duration. Material and Methods: Patients with osteoporosis were followed according to a standard protocol. Patients using denosumab for more than one year, with history of bisphosphonate exposure for at least one year, were recruited for analysis. Patients were monitored regularly in nurse-led clinic to ensure good drug adherence. Subcutaneous denosumab injection was administered by nurses as outpatient. BMD was measured by DXA scan. All subjects had adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The BMD of the total spine, neck of femur and total hip before and after commencement of denosumab was compared by dependent T-test. Results: 104 female subjects with a mean age of 73.7 ± 10.5 years were included in this report. All of the subjects had history of fragility fracture. Duration of oral bisphosphonate exposure before switching to denosumab was 4.5 ± 2.7 years. The oral bisphosphonate used was alendronate 70 mg once weekly. There was no statistically significant difference observed in BMD of the total spine (0.655 ± 0.105 vs. 0.662 ± 0.107 g/cm2 , p= 0.24), neck of femur (0.485 ± 0.080 vs. 0.480 ± 0.080 g/cm2 , P= 0.30) and total hip (0.589 ± 0.109 vs. 0.598 ± 0.112 g/cm2 , p= 0.09) before and 1 year after initiation of denosumab. Conclusions: Patients with prevalent fragility fracture, despite having relatively long history of bisphosphonate exposure, should be benefited by continuation of anti-osteoporosis treatment because of high fracture risk. However, switching this group of patients to denosumab may not reproduce the similar BMD improvement observed in patients who had taken bisphosphonate for short term. However, the efficacy of denosumab in fracture risk reduction in this group of patients needs further evaluation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer UK. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/orthopedics/journal/198-
dc.relation.ispartofOsteoporosis International: with other metabolic bone diseases-
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases, WCO-IOF-ESCEO 2016-
dc.titleEffect of denosumab on bone mineral density in patients with prior bisphosphonate exposure-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailWoo, YC: wooyucho@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChau, WK: chauwk3@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, KYJ: lamkyj@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLee, CHP: pchlee@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailTan, KCB: kcbtan@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLee, CHP=rp02043-
dc.identifier.authorityTan, KCB=rp00402-
dc.description.natureabstract-
dc.identifier.hkuros262343-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl. 1-
dc.identifier.spageS316, abstract no. P565-
dc.identifier.epageS316, abstract no. P565-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.partofdoi10.1007/s00198-016-3530-x-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats