File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/anae.13578
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84986275167
- PMID: 27506326
- WOS: WOS:000384089800013
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis
Title | Effects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Acute postoperative pain Analgesia General anaesthesia Propofol |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044 |
Citation | Anaesthesia, 2016, v. 71 n. 10, p. 1222-1233 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Propofol is used both for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Recent evidence shows that propofol has analgesic properties. This meta‐analysis evaluated differences in postoperative analgesia between general anaesthetic maintenance with intravenous propofol and inhalational anaesthetics. Fourteen trials met inclusion criteria and were included. Our outcomes were pain scores 2 and 24 h after surgery. No significant difference in pain scores was found at 2 h after surgery (Hedge's g (95% CI) −0.120 (−0.415–0.175) (p = 0.425). Propofol was associated with a statistically significant, albeit marginal, reduction in pain scores 24 h after surgery (Hedge's g (95% CI) −0.134 (−0.248 to −0.021) (p = 0.021). Data were insufficient to allow a meaningful analysis regarding 24‐h morphine‐equivalent consumption. Propofol was associated with reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (relative risk (95%CI) 0.446 (0.304–0.656) (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, this meta‐analysis suggests that propofol improves postoperative analgesia compared with inhalational anaesthesia 24 h after surgery, with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/231624 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.400 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Qiu, Q | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, SW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, SSC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Irwin, MG | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, CW | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-20T05:24:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-20T05:24:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Anaesthesia, 2016, v. 71 n. 10, p. 1222-1233 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2409 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/231624 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Propofol is used both for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Recent evidence shows that propofol has analgesic properties. This meta‐analysis evaluated differences in postoperative analgesia between general anaesthetic maintenance with intravenous propofol and inhalational anaesthetics. Fourteen trials met inclusion criteria and were included. Our outcomes were pain scores 2 and 24 h after surgery. No significant difference in pain scores was found at 2 h after surgery (Hedge's g (95% CI) −0.120 (−0.415–0.175) (p = 0.425). Propofol was associated with a statistically significant, albeit marginal, reduction in pain scores 24 h after surgery (Hedge's g (95% CI) −0.134 (−0.248 to −0.021) (p = 0.021). Data were insufficient to allow a meaningful analysis regarding 24‐h morphine‐equivalent consumption. Propofol was associated with reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (relative risk (95%CI) 0.446 (0.304–0.656) (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, this meta‐analysis suggests that propofol improves postoperative analgesia compared with inhalational anaesthesia 24 h after surgery, with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anaesthesia | - |
dc.subject | Acute postoperative pain | - |
dc.subject | Analgesia | - |
dc.subject | General anaesthesia | - |
dc.subject | Propofol | - |
dc.title | Effects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Choi, SW: htswchoi@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, SSC: wongstan@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Irwin, MG: mgirwin@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, CW: cheucw@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Choi, SW=rp02552 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Wong, SSC=rp01789 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Irwin, MG=rp00390 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, CW=rp00244 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/anae.13578 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27506326 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84986275167 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 266240 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 282857 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 71 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1222 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1233 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000384089800013 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0003-2409 | - |