File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Long-term evaluation of bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics to resin cement
Title | Long-term evaluation of bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics to resin cement |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Citation | The 94th General Session and Exhibition of the IADR, 3rd Meeting of the IADR Asia Pacific Region and 35th Annual Meeting of the IADR Korean Dicision, Seoul, Korea, 22-25 June 2016. How to Cite? |
Abstract | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength of three different CAD/CAM ceramics to six resin luting cements after long-term water storage.
METHODS: Three CAD/CAM ceramics(IPS e.max CAD, VITA ENAMIC and VITA SUPRINITY) were prepared into blocks(14 mm×12 mm×4 mm). Final crystallization for IPS e.max CAD and VITA SUPRINITY was obtained. Surface treatments on the ceramics were initially hydrofluoric acid(HF)(IPS Ceramic Etching gel) for 60s and then a silane coupling agent(Monobond-S) for 60s. Two blocks of each ceramic were bonded with six resin cements respectively: Clearfil SA Cement, Variolink II®, 3M RelyX Ultimate, VITA Duo cement, seT and NX3. Bonded blocks were cut into beams of 1.0mm2 cross-sectional area and randomly distributed to two subgroups according to two water storage times: 6 and 12 months. They were tested in a universal testing machine. Fracture surfaces were examined with polarized microscopy and SEM to determine failure modes. These results were compared with the data previously reported for 24-hour, 1-month and 3-month. Three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were used for statistical analysis(p<0.05).
RESULTS: Three-way ANOVA showed that all three independent factors(ceramic, resin luting cement) had significant effects on the bond strengths(p<0.001). Bond strengths in all groups decreased as a function of storage time. The 24 hour data was significantly higher than the other groups. The bond strength tested at 3, 6 and 12 months showed no statistical difference. Overall, the bond strength in Vita Suprinity® groups was the highest while IPS e.max® CAD groups had the lowest value in three ceramics(p<0.05). Variolink® II had the highest bond strength overall, followed by VITA Duo cement, 3M RelyX™ Ultimate, NX3 and Clearfil SA Cement. seT presented the lowest bond strength.
CONCLUSIONS: VITA Suprinity® and VITA Enamic® exhibited better long-term adhesion compared to IPS e.max® CAD. Different resin cements have different bonding behaviour according to prolonged water storage time. |
Description | Poster Session - Endodontic Restorations & CAD/CAM Studies; Studies on Resins in Clinical Dentistry: no. 1520 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/232192 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tian, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Burrow, MF | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tsoi, KH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Matinlinna, J | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-20T05:28:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-20T05:28:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The 94th General Session and Exhibition of the IADR, 3rd Meeting of the IADR Asia Pacific Region and 35th Annual Meeting of the IADR Korean Dicision, Seoul, Korea, 22-25 June 2016. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/232192 | - |
dc.description | Poster Session - Endodontic Restorations & CAD/CAM Studies; Studies on Resins in Clinical Dentistry: no. 1520 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength of three different CAD/CAM ceramics to six resin luting cements after long-term water storage. METHODS: Three CAD/CAM ceramics(IPS e.max CAD, VITA ENAMIC and VITA SUPRINITY) were prepared into blocks(14 mm×12 mm×4 mm). Final crystallization for IPS e.max CAD and VITA SUPRINITY was obtained. Surface treatments on the ceramics were initially hydrofluoric acid(HF)(IPS Ceramic Etching gel) for 60s and then a silane coupling agent(Monobond-S) for 60s. Two blocks of each ceramic were bonded with six resin cements respectively: Clearfil SA Cement, Variolink II®, 3M RelyX Ultimate, VITA Duo cement, seT and NX3. Bonded blocks were cut into beams of 1.0mm2 cross-sectional area and randomly distributed to two subgroups according to two water storage times: 6 and 12 months. They were tested in a universal testing machine. Fracture surfaces were examined with polarized microscopy and SEM to determine failure modes. These results were compared with the data previously reported for 24-hour, 1-month and 3-month. Three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were used for statistical analysis(p<0.05). RESULTS: Three-way ANOVA showed that all three independent factors(ceramic, resin luting cement) had significant effects on the bond strengths(p<0.001). Bond strengths in all groups decreased as a function of storage time. The 24 hour data was significantly higher than the other groups. The bond strength tested at 3, 6 and 12 months showed no statistical difference. Overall, the bond strength in Vita Suprinity® groups was the highest while IPS e.max® CAD groups had the lowest value in three ceramics(p<0.05). Variolink® II had the highest bond strength overall, followed by VITA Duo cement, 3M RelyX™ Ultimate, NX3 and Clearfil SA Cement. seT presented the lowest bond strength. CONCLUSIONS: VITA Suprinity® and VITA Enamic® exhibited better long-term adhesion compared to IPS e.max® CAD. Different resin cements have different bonding behaviour according to prolonged water storage time. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | General Session of the International Association for Dental Research, IADR 2016 | - |
dc.title | Long-term evaluation of bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics to resin cement | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Tian, T: tian516@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Burrow, MF: mfburr58@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Tsoi, KH: jkhtsoi@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Matinlinna, J: jpmat@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Burrow, MF=rp01306 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Tsoi, KH=rp01609 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Matinlinna, J=rp00052 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 263883 | - |