File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00520-005-0775-x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-21644455005
- PMID: 15717159
- WOS: WOS:000230176100001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Psychometric testing of the Impact of Event Scale-Chinese Version (IES-C) in oral cancer patients in Taiwan
Title | Psychometric testing of the Impact of Event Scale-Chinese Version (IES-C) in oral cancer patients in Taiwan |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Reliability Validity Avoidance Impact of Event Scale Intrusion Oral cancer Psychometrics |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Citation | Supportive Care in Cancer, 2005, v. 13, n. 7, p. 485-492 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Goals of work: No culturally relevant instrument exists to assess the impact of cancer on patients in Taiwan. Therefore, this two-phase study was undertaken to (1) develop a Chinese version of the Impact of Event Scale (IES), (2) examine its psychometric properties, and (3) use the IES-Chinese version (IES-C) to assess the impact of cancer in newly diagnosed oral cancer patients in Taiwan. Patients and methods: The psychometric properties of the 15-item IES-C were tested in 106 newly diagnosed oral cancer patients and analyzed by descriptive statistics, test-retest reliability, Pearson's correlation, and principal component analysis. Main results: The results showed that (1) the IES-C has satisfactory content validity and feasibility; (2) overall internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.91 with values of 0.91 and 0.81 for intrusion and avoidance, respectively; (3) overall test-retest reliability (3-day interval) was 0.97; (4) two clearly identified factors explained 55.97% of the variance; (5) satisfactory construct validity was supported by both factor analysis and theoretically supported correlation analysis (significant correlations between the total IES-C and its subscales as well as anxiety and depression); and (6) oral cancer patients had relatively higher IES-C scores than previously reported. Conclusions: These results support the IES-C as an instrument with satisfactory psychometric properties and ease of use in clinical settings. They also suggest that more attention should be paid to the impact on patients of a new diagnosis of oral cancer. Further testing of the IES-C in different cancer populations is suggested to validate its psychometric properties. © Springer-Verlag 2005. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/241135 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.007 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Shu Ching | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, Yeur Hur | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liao, Chun Ta | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Chia Chin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-26T03:36:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-26T03:36:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Supportive Care in Cancer, 2005, v. 13, n. 7, p. 485-492 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0941-4355 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/241135 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Goals of work: No culturally relevant instrument exists to assess the impact of cancer on patients in Taiwan. Therefore, this two-phase study was undertaken to (1) develop a Chinese version of the Impact of Event Scale (IES), (2) examine its psychometric properties, and (3) use the IES-Chinese version (IES-C) to assess the impact of cancer in newly diagnosed oral cancer patients in Taiwan. Patients and methods: The psychometric properties of the 15-item IES-C were tested in 106 newly diagnosed oral cancer patients and analyzed by descriptive statistics, test-retest reliability, Pearson's correlation, and principal component analysis. Main results: The results showed that (1) the IES-C has satisfactory content validity and feasibility; (2) overall internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.91 with values of 0.91 and 0.81 for intrusion and avoidance, respectively; (3) overall test-retest reliability (3-day interval) was 0.97; (4) two clearly identified factors explained 55.97% of the variance; (5) satisfactory construct validity was supported by both factor analysis and theoretically supported correlation analysis (significant correlations between the total IES-C and its subscales as well as anxiety and depression); and (6) oral cancer patients had relatively higher IES-C scores than previously reported. Conclusions: These results support the IES-C as an instrument with satisfactory psychometric properties and ease of use in clinical settings. They also suggest that more attention should be paid to the impact on patients of a new diagnosis of oral cancer. Further testing of the IES-C in different cancer populations is suggested to validate its psychometric properties. © Springer-Verlag 2005. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Supportive Care in Cancer | - |
dc.subject | Reliability | - |
dc.subject | Validity | - |
dc.subject | Avoidance | - |
dc.subject | Impact of Event Scale | - |
dc.subject | Intrusion | - |
dc.subject | Oral cancer | - |
dc.subject | Psychometrics | - |
dc.title | Psychometric testing of the Impact of Event Scale-Chinese Version (IES-C) in oral cancer patients in Taiwan | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00520-005-0775-x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15717159 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-21644455005 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 485 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 492 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000230176100001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0941-4355 | - |