File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Measurement of physical activity in cancer survivors: A validity study

TitleMeasurement of physical activity in cancer survivors: A validity study
Authors
KeywordsValidation
Reliability
Physical activity
Cancer survivors
Validity
Issue Date2014
Citation
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2014, v. 8, n. 2, p. 205-212 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The purpose of the study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-T) and to assess physical activity in Taiwanese cancer survivors. Methods: One hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors participated in this study. Instruments consisted of the PASE-T, the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-T), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and actigraph. Reliability was assessed by calculating the test-retest reliability. The validity was assessed by the content validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and known-group validity. Results: The test-retest reliability of PASE-T was 0.90 over a 2-week interval, based on a sample of 30 patients. The content validity index was very acceptable at 0.91. Convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant association with MDASI-T scores (symptom severity: r = -0.23, p = 0.001; symptom interference: r = -0.21, p = 0.001) and KPS scores (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). Criterion-related validity was established by a significant relationship to the actigraph total counts per minute (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). Known-group validity was established by its ability to detect significant differences according to a patient's performance status. Moreover, KPS (β = 0.37), fatigue (β = -0.32), and age (β = -0.20) were significant predictors of physical activity (R 2 = 0.46). Conclusions: The PASE-T is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of physical activity among cancer survivors in Taiwan. Implication for Cancer Survivors: This scale could be a useful measure of physical activity in cancer survivors and subsequently facilitate the quality of oncology care. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/241205
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.201
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSu, Ching Ching-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kuan Der-
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Chung Hung-
dc.contributor.authorKao, Ching Chiu-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chia Chin-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-26T03:37:06Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-26T03:37:06Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cancer Survivorship, 2014, v. 8, n. 2, p. 205-212-
dc.identifier.issn1932-2259-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/241205-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of the study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-T) and to assess physical activity in Taiwanese cancer survivors. Methods: One hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors participated in this study. Instruments consisted of the PASE-T, the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-T), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and actigraph. Reliability was assessed by calculating the test-retest reliability. The validity was assessed by the content validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and known-group validity. Results: The test-retest reliability of PASE-T was 0.90 over a 2-week interval, based on a sample of 30 patients. The content validity index was very acceptable at 0.91. Convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant association with MDASI-T scores (symptom severity: r = -0.23, p = 0.001; symptom interference: r = -0.21, p = 0.001) and KPS scores (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). Criterion-related validity was established by a significant relationship to the actigraph total counts per minute (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). Known-group validity was established by its ability to detect significant differences according to a patient's performance status. Moreover, KPS (β = 0.37), fatigue (β = -0.32), and age (β = -0.20) were significant predictors of physical activity (R 2 = 0.46). Conclusions: The PASE-T is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of physical activity among cancer survivors in Taiwan. Implication for Cancer Survivors: This scale could be a useful measure of physical activity in cancer survivors and subsequently facilitate the quality of oncology care. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cancer Survivorship-
dc.subjectValidation-
dc.subjectReliability-
dc.subjectPhysical activity-
dc.subjectCancer survivors-
dc.subjectValidity-
dc.titleMeasurement of physical activity in cancer survivors: A validity study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11764-013-0325-3-
dc.identifier.pmid24317970-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84900325457-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage205-
dc.identifier.epage212-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-2267-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000340232100008-
dc.identifier.issnl1932-2259-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats