File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001246
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85021104952
- PMID: 28644239
- WOS: WOS:000407380100007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effect of the Learning Curve on Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction
Title | Effect of the Learning Curve on Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | astigmatism Key Words: SMILE learning outcomes |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.corneajrnl.com/ |
Citation | Cornea, 2017, v. 36 n. 9, p. 1044-1050 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To investigate the effect of the learning curve for small-incision lenticule extraction during the first 2 years of experience. Methods: Small-incision lenticule extraction was performed using the 500-kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) by the same surgeon. The initial 100 patients since the surgeon started operating independently were considered as group 1; the recent 100 patients were considered as group 2. The same laser settings and technique were used. The visual and refractive outcomes were compared between groups at postoperative 1 week and 6 months. Vector analysis was performed for eyes with astigmatic correction. Results: Two hundred right eyes of 200 patients were included. Age, preoperative corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, and central corneal thickness were similar between groups (P ≤ 0.154). Postoperatively, the efficacy index at 1 week was better in group 2 (group 1: 0.85 ± 0.16 vs. group 2: 0.91 ± 0.10, P = 0.019) but was similar between groups at 6 months (group 1: 0.91 ± 0.14 vs. group 2: 0.94 ± 0.08, P = 0.181). The safety index was higher in group 2 at 1 week (group 1: 0.93 ± 0.10 vs. group 2: 0.95 ± 0.08, P = 0.045) and 6 months postoperatively (group 1: 0.97 ± 0.07 vs. group 2: 0.99 ± 0.03, P = 0.011). Vector analysis showed that postoperative residual astigmatism and misalignment of astigmatic correction were lower in group 2 than in group 1 (P ≤ 0.039) at 1 week and 6 months. The duration of docking and that of lenticule extraction was shorter in group 2 (P ≤ 0.034). Conclusions: Our study showed that faster visual recovery, better safety profile, and more accurate astigmatic correction could be attained with increasing surgical experience. © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242121 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.019 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, TCY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, LKA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, GPM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Woo, CPV | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jhanji, V | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-24T01:35:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-24T01:35:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Cornea, 2017, v. 36 n. 9, p. 1044-1050 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-3740 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242121 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To investigate the effect of the learning curve for small-incision lenticule extraction during the first 2 years of experience. Methods: Small-incision lenticule extraction was performed using the 500-kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) by the same surgeon. The initial 100 patients since the surgeon started operating independently were considered as group 1; the recent 100 patients were considered as group 2. The same laser settings and technique were used. The visual and refractive outcomes were compared between groups at postoperative 1 week and 6 months. Vector analysis was performed for eyes with astigmatic correction. Results: Two hundred right eyes of 200 patients were included. Age, preoperative corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, and central corneal thickness were similar between groups (P ≤ 0.154). Postoperatively, the efficacy index at 1 week was better in group 2 (group 1: 0.85 ± 0.16 vs. group 2: 0.91 ± 0.10, P = 0.019) but was similar between groups at 6 months (group 1: 0.91 ± 0.14 vs. group 2: 0.94 ± 0.08, P = 0.181). The safety index was higher in group 2 at 1 week (group 1: 0.93 ± 0.10 vs. group 2: 0.95 ± 0.08, P = 0.045) and 6 months postoperatively (group 1: 0.97 ± 0.07 vs. group 2: 0.99 ± 0.03, P = 0.011). Vector analysis showed that postoperative residual astigmatism and misalignment of astigmatic correction were lower in group 2 than in group 1 (P ≤ 0.039) at 1 week and 6 months. The duration of docking and that of lenticule extraction was shorter in group 2 (P ≤ 0.034). Conclusions: Our study showed that faster visual recovery, better safety profile, and more accurate astigmatic correction could be attained with increasing surgical experience. © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.corneajrnl.com/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cornea | - |
dc.rights | This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in (provide complete journal citation) | - |
dc.subject | astigmatism | - |
dc.subject | Key Words: SMILE | - |
dc.subject | learning | - |
dc.subject | outcomes | - |
dc.title | Effect of the Learning Curve on Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, LKA: nlk008@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, LKA=rp01842 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001246 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28644239 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85021104952 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 273171 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 36 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1044 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1050 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000407380100007 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0277-3740 | - |