File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.9058
- WOS: WOS:000404711506204
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Phase 3 study of first-line crizotinib vs pemetrexed−cisplatin/carboplatin in East Asian patients with ALK+ advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Title | Phase 3 study of first-line crizotinib vs pemetrexed−cisplatin/carboplatin in East Asian patients with ALK+ advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jco.org/ |
Citation | 52nd Annual Meeting of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO 2016), Chicago, USA, 3-7 June 2016. In Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, v. 34 n. 15, Suppl., p. Abstract # 9058 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: The phase 3 study PROFILE 1014 showed a superior outcome of crizotinib over PCC in ALK+ NSCLC. A phase 3 study of similar design (ongoing; NCT01639001) was conducted in an East Asian population in China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Taiwan, and Thailand. Methods: The study was designed to detect an improvement in median PFS from 6.4 to 10 mo with 80% power and 1-sided type I error of 0.025. Between Sep 2012 and Jul 2014, 207 pts with previously untreated ALK+ advanced NSCLC were randomized 1:1 (stratification: ECOG PS 0/1 vs 2) to receive crizotinib 250 mg PO BID (n = 104) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 with either cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5–6, IV q3w for ≤ 6 cycles (n = 103). Continuation of/crossover to crizotinib after PD (per independent radiological review) was allowed. The primary endpoint was PFS; key secondary endpoints were ORR, OS, safety, and PROs. Results: In the crizotinib and PCC arms, respectively, 91% and 93% were Han Chinese, 95% and 95% had ECOG PS 0/1, and 20% and 31% had brain metastases. The study met its primary objective: crizotinib significantly prolonged PFS vs PCC (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29–0.57; 1-sided P < 0.0001; median 11.1 and 6.8 mo). The ORR was significantly higher with crizotinib (87.5% vs 45.6%; 2-sided P < 0.0001). At data cutoff, 82 pts (80%) on PCC had crossed over to crizotinib and 59% of pts (122/207) remained in follow-up. With only 35% of OS events, there was a numerical (not statistically significant) improvement in OS with crizotinib (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.56–1.45; 1-sided P = 0.33). Crizotinib and PCC safety profiles were consistent with those previously published. The most common all-causality AEs with crizotinib were elevated transaminases (69%), diarrhea (59%), and vision disorder (56%); the most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (16%) and elevated transaminases (12%). Two grade 5 AEs (death of unknown cause, interstitial lung disease) were considered crizotinib-related. Conclusions: These results confirm the findings from PROFILE 1014 and demonstrate that first-line crizotinib significantly improves PFS and ORR vs PCC in an East Asian population with ALK+ advanced NSCLC with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01639001. |
Description | Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242366 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 42.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 10.639 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lu, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mok, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shi, YK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sriuranpong, V | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, JCM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ong, CK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tsai, CM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, CH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wilner, KD | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Masters, E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Selaru, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, YL | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-24T01:38:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-24T01:38:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 52nd Annual Meeting of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO 2016), Chicago, USA, 3-7 June 2016. In Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, v. 34 n. 15, Suppl., p. Abstract # 9058 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0732-183X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242366 | - |
dc.description | Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The phase 3 study PROFILE 1014 showed a superior outcome of crizotinib over PCC in ALK+ NSCLC. A phase 3 study of similar design (ongoing; NCT01639001) was conducted in an East Asian population in China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Taiwan, and Thailand. Methods: The study was designed to detect an improvement in median PFS from 6.4 to 10 mo with 80% power and 1-sided type I error of 0.025. Between Sep 2012 and Jul 2014, 207 pts with previously untreated ALK+ advanced NSCLC were randomized 1:1 (stratification: ECOG PS 0/1 vs 2) to receive crizotinib 250 mg PO BID (n = 104) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 with either cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5–6, IV q3w for ≤ 6 cycles (n = 103). Continuation of/crossover to crizotinib after PD (per independent radiological review) was allowed. The primary endpoint was PFS; key secondary endpoints were ORR, OS, safety, and PROs. Results: In the crizotinib and PCC arms, respectively, 91% and 93% were Han Chinese, 95% and 95% had ECOG PS 0/1, and 20% and 31% had brain metastases. The study met its primary objective: crizotinib significantly prolonged PFS vs PCC (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29–0.57; 1-sided P < 0.0001; median 11.1 and 6.8 mo). The ORR was significantly higher with crizotinib (87.5% vs 45.6%; 2-sided P < 0.0001). At data cutoff, 82 pts (80%) on PCC had crossed over to crizotinib and 59% of pts (122/207) remained in follow-up. With only 35% of OS events, there was a numerical (not statistically significant) improvement in OS with crizotinib (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.56–1.45; 1-sided P = 0.33). Crizotinib and PCC safety profiles were consistent with those previously published. The most common all-causality AEs with crizotinib were elevated transaminases (69%), diarrhea (59%), and vision disorder (56%); the most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (16%) and elevated transaminases (12%). Two grade 5 AEs (death of unknown cause, interstitial lung disease) were considered crizotinib-related. Conclusions: These results confirm the findings from PROFILE 1014 and demonstrate that first-line crizotinib significantly improves PFS and ORR vs PCC in an East Asian population with ALK+ advanced NSCLC with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01639001. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jco.org/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Oncology | - |
dc.title | Phase 3 study of first-line crizotinib vs pemetrexed−cisplatin/carboplatin in East Asian patients with ALK+ advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, JCM: jhocm@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ho, JCM=rp00258 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.9058 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 273495 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 15, Suppl. | - |
dc.identifier.spage | Abstract # 9058 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | Abstract # 9058 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000404711506204 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0732-183X | - |