File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Types of control in acupuncture clinical trials might affect the conclusion of the trials
Title | Types of control in acupuncture clinical trials might affect the conclusion of the trials |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Citation | Society for Acupuncture Research (SAR) Conference: Advancing the Precision Medicine Initiative through Acupuncture Research, San Francisco, California, USA, 27-29 April 2017 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: To develop acupuncture research guideline, the association of types of control in acupuncture clinical trials and conclusions was investigated. Design: Published RCTs of acupuncture within 10 years were retrieved from electronic databases (Medline, AMED, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CAB Abstracts) by the pre-specified search strategy. Results: 362 studies leading to 394 pairs of acupuncture-control treatment effect comparison (31 studies comprised of 63 intervention-control pairs) were analysed based on the proportion of positive conclusion in different control designs. In trials studying pain condition, we found that treatment effect of acupuncture compared with needle-insertion controls had the lowest tendency to yield positive conclusion (37.8%), compared to non-needle-insertion controls (53.3%). Whereas with non-treatment controls, the highest tendency of positive conclusion was observed (84.3%). In trials studying non-pain condition, we found that treatment effect of acupuncture compared with needle-insertion controls had the highest tendency to yield positive conclusion (68.3%), compared to non-needle-insertion controls (45.7%). Whereas with needle-insertion controls, the higher tendency of positive conclusion was observed (64%). It is likely that superficial needling at non-acupoint did not exert significant therapeutic dose when needle-insertion was used as the sham control group for non-pain conditions. However, superficial needling at non-acupoint was likely to exert therapeutic dose when needle-insertion was used as the sham control groups for pain conditions. Conclusion: We conclude that type of control is likely to affect the conclusion in acupuncture trials. The effectiveness of blinding should be carefully assessed when using superficial needle-insertion control in studying pain conditions. The findings will support developing an acupuncture clinical research methodology guideline. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242524 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chen, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | NING, Z | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, BFL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ziea, ETC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lao, L | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-24T01:40:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-24T01:40:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Society for Acupuncture Research (SAR) Conference: Advancing the Precision Medicine Initiative through Acupuncture Research, San Francisco, California, USA, 27-29 April 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242524 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To develop acupuncture research guideline, the association of types of control in acupuncture clinical trials and conclusions was investigated. Design: Published RCTs of acupuncture within 10 years were retrieved from electronic databases (Medline, AMED, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CAB Abstracts) by the pre-specified search strategy. Results: 362 studies leading to 394 pairs of acupuncture-control treatment effect comparison (31 studies comprised of 63 intervention-control pairs) were analysed based on the proportion of positive conclusion in different control designs. In trials studying pain condition, we found that treatment effect of acupuncture compared with needle-insertion controls had the lowest tendency to yield positive conclusion (37.8%), compared to non-needle-insertion controls (53.3%). Whereas with non-treatment controls, the highest tendency of positive conclusion was observed (84.3%). In trials studying non-pain condition, we found that treatment effect of acupuncture compared with needle-insertion controls had the highest tendency to yield positive conclusion (68.3%), compared to non-needle-insertion controls (45.7%). Whereas with needle-insertion controls, the higher tendency of positive conclusion was observed (64%). It is likely that superficial needling at non-acupoint did not exert significant therapeutic dose when needle-insertion was used as the sham control group for non-pain conditions. However, superficial needling at non-acupoint was likely to exert therapeutic dose when needle-insertion was used as the sham control groups for pain conditions. Conclusion: We conclude that type of control is likely to affect the conclusion in acupuncture trials. The effectiveness of blinding should be carefully assessed when using superficial needle-insertion control in studying pain conditions. The findings will support developing an acupuncture clinical research methodology guideline. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Society for Acupuncture Research (SAR) Conference | - |
dc.title | Types of control in acupuncture clinical trials might affect the conclusion of the trials | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chen, H: haiyong@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lao, L: lxlao1@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chen, H=rp01923 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lao, L=rp01784 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 273610 | - |