File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Types of control in acupuncture clinical trials might affect the conclusion of the trials

TitleTypes of control in acupuncture clinical trials might affect the conclusion of the trials
Authors
Issue Date2017
Citation
Society for Acupuncture Research (SAR) Conference: Advancing the Precision Medicine Initiative through Acupuncture Research, San Francisco, California, USA, 27-29 April 2017  How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To develop acupuncture research guideline, the association of types of control in acupuncture clinical trials and conclusions was investigated. Design: Published RCTs of acupuncture within 10 years were retrieved from electronic databases (Medline, AMED, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CAB Abstracts) by the pre-specified search strategy. Results: 362 studies leading to 394 pairs of acupuncture-control treatment effect comparison (31 studies comprised of 63 intervention-control pairs) were analysed based on the proportion of positive conclusion in different control designs. In trials studying pain condition, we found that treatment effect of acupuncture compared with needle-insertion controls had the lowest tendency to yield positive conclusion (37.8%), compared to non-needle-insertion controls (53.3%). Whereas with non-treatment controls, the highest tendency of positive conclusion was observed (84.3%). In trials studying non-pain condition, we found that treatment effect of acupuncture compared with needle-insertion controls had the highest tendency to yield positive conclusion (68.3%), compared to non-needle-insertion controls (45.7%). Whereas with needle-insertion controls, the higher tendency of positive conclusion was observed (64%). It is likely that superficial needling at non-acupoint did not exert significant therapeutic dose when needle-insertion was used as the sham control group for non-pain conditions. However, superficial needling at non-acupoint was likely to exert therapeutic dose when needle-insertion was used as the sham control groups for pain conditions. Conclusion: We conclude that type of control is likely to affect the conclusion in acupuncture trials. The effectiveness of blinding should be carefully assessed when using superficial needle-insertion control in studying pain conditions. The findings will support developing an acupuncture clinical research methodology guideline.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/242524

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, H-
dc.contributor.authorNING, Z-
dc.contributor.authorWong, N-
dc.contributor.authorNg, BFL-
dc.contributor.authorZiea, ETC-
dc.contributor.authorLao, L-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-24T01:40:54Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-24T01:40:54Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationSociety for Acupuncture Research (SAR) Conference: Advancing the Precision Medicine Initiative through Acupuncture Research, San Francisco, California, USA, 27-29 April 2017 -
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/242524-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To develop acupuncture research guideline, the association of types of control in acupuncture clinical trials and conclusions was investigated. Design: Published RCTs of acupuncture within 10 years were retrieved from electronic databases (Medline, AMED, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CAB Abstracts) by the pre-specified search strategy. Results: 362 studies leading to 394 pairs of acupuncture-control treatment effect comparison (31 studies comprised of 63 intervention-control pairs) were analysed based on the proportion of positive conclusion in different control designs. In trials studying pain condition, we found that treatment effect of acupuncture compared with needle-insertion controls had the lowest tendency to yield positive conclusion (37.8%), compared to non-needle-insertion controls (53.3%). Whereas with non-treatment controls, the highest tendency of positive conclusion was observed (84.3%). In trials studying non-pain condition, we found that treatment effect of acupuncture compared with needle-insertion controls had the highest tendency to yield positive conclusion (68.3%), compared to non-needle-insertion controls (45.7%). Whereas with needle-insertion controls, the higher tendency of positive conclusion was observed (64%). It is likely that superficial needling at non-acupoint did not exert significant therapeutic dose when needle-insertion was used as the sham control group for non-pain conditions. However, superficial needling at non-acupoint was likely to exert therapeutic dose when needle-insertion was used as the sham control groups for pain conditions. Conclusion: We conclude that type of control is likely to affect the conclusion in acupuncture trials. The effectiveness of blinding should be carefully assessed when using superficial needle-insertion control in studying pain conditions. The findings will support developing an acupuncture clinical research methodology guideline.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSociety for Acupuncture Research (SAR) Conference-
dc.titleTypes of control in acupuncture clinical trials might affect the conclusion of the trials-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChen, H: haiyong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLao, L: lxlao1@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChen, H=rp01923-
dc.identifier.authorityLao, L=rp01784-
dc.identifier.hkuros273610-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats