File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Awareness-related activity in prefrontal and parietal cortices in blindsight reflects more than superior visual performance

TitleAwareness-related activity in prefrontal and parietal cortices in blindsight reflects more than superior visual performance
Authors
KeywordsConsciousness
Metacognition
Visual perception
Blindsight
Issue Date2011
Citation
NeuroImage, 2011, v. 58, n. 2, p. 605-611 How to Cite?
AbstractMany imaging studies report activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortices when subjects are aware as opposed to unaware of visual stimuli. One possibility is that this activity simply reflects higher signal strength or the superior task performance that is associated with awareness. To find out, we studied the hemianope GY who has unilateral destruction of almost all primary visual cortices. He exhibits 'blindsight', that is, he claims to have no conscious visual phenomenology (i.e., no visual qualia), for stationary stimuli presented to his right visual field (the blind field), although he can press keys to distinguish between different stimuli presented there. We presented to him a visual discrimination task, and equated performance for stimuli presented to the left or right visual field by presenting low contrast stimuli to his normal (left) field and high contrast stimuli to his blind (right) field. Superior accuracy can be a serious confound, and our paradigm allows us to control for it and avoid this confound. Even when performance was matched, and the signal strength was lower, visual stimulation to the normal (conscious) field led to higher activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortices. These results indicate that the activity in the prefrontal and parietal areas that has been reported in previous studies of awareness is not just due to a (signal strength or performance) confounds. One possibility is that it reflects the superior 'metacognitive' capacity that is associated with awareness, because GY was better able to distinguish between his own correct and incorrect responses for stimuli presented to his normal field than to his blind field. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/242618
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.436
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPersaud, Navindra-
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorManiscalco, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorMobbs, Dean-
dc.contributor.authorPassingham, Richard E.-
dc.contributor.authorCowey, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Hakwan-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-10T10:51:08Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-10T10:51:08Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroImage, 2011, v. 58, n. 2, p. 605-611-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/242618-
dc.description.abstractMany imaging studies report activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortices when subjects are aware as opposed to unaware of visual stimuli. One possibility is that this activity simply reflects higher signal strength or the superior task performance that is associated with awareness. To find out, we studied the hemianope GY who has unilateral destruction of almost all primary visual cortices. He exhibits 'blindsight', that is, he claims to have no conscious visual phenomenology (i.e., no visual qualia), for stationary stimuli presented to his right visual field (the blind field), although he can press keys to distinguish between different stimuli presented there. We presented to him a visual discrimination task, and equated performance for stimuli presented to the left or right visual field by presenting low contrast stimuli to his normal (left) field and high contrast stimuli to his blind (right) field. Superior accuracy can be a serious confound, and our paradigm allows us to control for it and avoid this confound. Even when performance was matched, and the signal strength was lower, visual stimulation to the normal (conscious) field led to higher activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortices. These results indicate that the activity in the prefrontal and parietal areas that has been reported in previous studies of awareness is not just due to a (signal strength or performance) confounds. One possibility is that it reflects the superior 'metacognitive' capacity that is associated with awareness, because GY was better able to distinguish between his own correct and incorrect responses for stimuli presented to his normal field than to his blind field. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroImage-
dc.subjectConsciousness-
dc.subjectMetacognition-
dc.subjectVisual perception-
dc.subjectBlindsight-
dc.titleAwareness-related activity in prefrontal and parietal cortices in blindsight reflects more than superior visual performance-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.081-
dc.identifier.pmid21763441-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-80051782721-
dc.identifier.volume58-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage605-
dc.identifier.epage611-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-9572-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000294525000030-
dc.identifier.issnl1053-8119-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats