File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Hunting for artifacts: The perils of dismissing inconsistent replication results

TitleHunting for artifacts: The perils of dismissing inconsistent replication results
Authors
KeywordsReplication
Cleanliness
Moral judgment
Preregistration
Issue Date2014
Citation
Social Psychology, 2014, v. 45, n. 4, p. 318-320 How to Cite?
AbstractWe attempted high-powered direct replications of the two experiments in Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008) and did not duplicate the original results. We therefore concluded that more research was needed to establish the size and robustness of the original effects and to evaluate potential moderators. Schnall (2014) suggests that our conclusions were invalid because of potential psychometric artifacts in our data. We present evidence that undermines concerns about artifacts and defend the utility of preregistered replication studies for advancing research in psychological science. © 2014 Hogrefe Publishing.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/242691
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.668
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, David J.-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Felix-
dc.contributor.authorDonnellan, M. Brent-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-10T10:51:20Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-10T10:51:20Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Psychology, 2014, v. 45, n. 4, p. 318-320-
dc.identifier.issn1864-9335-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/242691-
dc.description.abstractWe attempted high-powered direct replications of the two experiments in Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008) and did not duplicate the original results. We therefore concluded that more research was needed to establish the size and robustness of the original effects and to evaluate potential moderators. Schnall (2014) suggests that our conclusions were invalid because of potential psychometric artifacts in our data. We present evidence that undermines concerns about artifacts and defend the utility of preregistered replication studies for advancing research in psychological science. © 2014 Hogrefe Publishing.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Psychology-
dc.subjectReplication-
dc.subjectCleanliness-
dc.subjectMoral judgment-
dc.subjectPreregistration-
dc.titleHunting for artifacts: The perils of dismissing inconsistent replication results-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1027/1864-9335/a000204-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84923327140-
dc.identifier.hkuros247949-
dc.identifier.hkuros289100-
dc.identifier.volume45-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage318-
dc.identifier.epage320-
dc.identifier.eissn2151-2590-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000341226100013-
dc.identifier.issnl1864-9335-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats