File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/ajpy.12124
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84969888739
- WOS: WOS:000383366000007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Threat-related gaze fixation and its relationship with the speed and generalisability of extinction learning
Title | Threat-related gaze fixation and its relationship with the speed and generalisability of extinction learning |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | individual differences emotional disorders experimental psychopathology conditioning and learning cognitive processes attention and perception |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Citation | Australian Journal of Psychology, 2016, v. 68, n. 3, p. 200-208 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2016 The Australian Psychological Society Objective: Attention plays an important role in the treatment of anxiety. Research has yet to elucidate how individual differences in attention or, particularly, gaze fixation can influence learning during treatment. The present investigation used an experimental analogue of the acquisition, treatment, and relapse of fear to examine this issue. Method: After pairing a stimulus (A) with an aversive electrocutaneous shock, such that participants come to fear this previously neutral stimulus, participants are repeatedly presented with a second stimulus (B) that possessed some common features with A as well as some of its own unique features. During presentations of B, fear was expected to reduce or extinguish. After this, participants were presented with C, which possessed some features of A that were not present in B as well as some features of B that were not present in A, and return of fear was assessed. Throughout this procedure, differences in gaze were measured so that this could be compared with indices for extinction and return of fear. Fear was measured in terms of skin conductance response. Results: Participants who spent more time looking at the unique features of B or who avoided the features in common with A showed slower extinction of their fear response. The same participants also showed reduced return of fear when C was presented. Conclusions: These findings are interpreted in terms of how attentional avoidance of threat-related stimuli might influence the inhibitory learning that takes place during extinction in experimental settings and exposure in clinical settings. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242693 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.096 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Barry, Tom J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vervliet, Bram | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hermans, Dirk | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-10T10:51:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-10T10:51:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Australian Journal of Psychology, 2016, v. 68, n. 3, p. 200-208 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0004-9530 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/242693 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2016 The Australian Psychological Society Objective: Attention plays an important role in the treatment of anxiety. Research has yet to elucidate how individual differences in attention or, particularly, gaze fixation can influence learning during treatment. The present investigation used an experimental analogue of the acquisition, treatment, and relapse of fear to examine this issue. Method: After pairing a stimulus (A) with an aversive electrocutaneous shock, such that participants come to fear this previously neutral stimulus, participants are repeatedly presented with a second stimulus (B) that possessed some common features with A as well as some of its own unique features. During presentations of B, fear was expected to reduce or extinguish. After this, participants were presented with C, which possessed some features of A that were not present in B as well as some features of B that were not present in A, and return of fear was assessed. Throughout this procedure, differences in gaze were measured so that this could be compared with indices for extinction and return of fear. Fear was measured in terms of skin conductance response. Results: Participants who spent more time looking at the unique features of B or who avoided the features in common with A showed slower extinction of their fear response. The same participants also showed reduced return of fear when C was presented. Conclusions: These findings are interpreted in terms of how attentional avoidance of threat-related stimuli might influence the inhibitory learning that takes place during extinction in experimental settings and exposure in clinical settings. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Australian Journal of Psychology | - |
dc.subject | individual differences | - |
dc.subject | emotional disorders | - |
dc.subject | experimental psychopathology | - |
dc.subject | conditioning and learning | - |
dc.subject | cognitive processes | - |
dc.subject | attention and perception | - |
dc.title | Threat-related gaze fixation and its relationship with the speed and generalisability of extinction learning | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ajpy.12124 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84969888739 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 68 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 200 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 208 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1742-9536 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000383366000007 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0004-9530 | - |