File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Single-center experience of long-term survival outcome between primary liver transplantation and hepatic resection with consequent salvage transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan Criteria

TitleSingle-center experience of long-term survival outcome between primary liver transplantation and hepatic resection with consequent salvage transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan Criteria
Authors
Issue Date2017
Citation
The 2017 Joint International Congress of ILTS, ELITA & LICAGE, Prague, Czech Republic, 24-27 May 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Whether primary liver transplantation (PLT) is superior to the upfront hepatic resection (HR) and salvage liver transplantation (SLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria is debatable. Aim of study: To compare the long-term survival rates of patients with HCC within Milan criteria undergoing PLT with those undergoing HR + SLT. Patients and methods: Patients with HCC within Milan criteria underwent PLT (n = 149) or HR + SLT (n = 26) were analyzed retrospectively from a prospective database. Patients' demographic characteristics, short-term and long-term outcome measures were compared between 2 groups. Results: Patients' demographic characteristics and tumor status were comparable between 2 groups. PLT group has significantly higher MELD score than HR + SLT group. More patients in HR + SLT group (80.7%) received living donor liver transplantation than those in PLT group (61.7%). Nevertheless, the graft weight to recipient standard liver volume was similar between groups. Hospital mortality was 2.6% in PLT group and 0% in HR + SLT group. The postoperative complication rate was comparable between groups. With median follow-up of 55 months, overall tumor recurrence rate was lower in PLT group (7.9%) than HR + SLT group (26.9%). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates for PLT group and HR + SLT group were 96%, 89.9%, 96.7% and 100%, 92.3%, 76.9%, respectively. (P = 0.110) On multivariate analysis, Preoperative serum alpha fetoprotein level and microvascular tumor invasion were independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusion: Both PLT and HR + SLT are effective treatment modalities for early stage HCC in terms of similar overall survival rate. However, tumor recurrence is significant high in HR + SLT group. Better patient selection in terms of those with favorable tumor characteristics is warrant in patients undergoing SLT for recurrent HCC.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/243420

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, KCK-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-25T02:54:36Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-25T02:54:36Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationThe 2017 Joint International Congress of ILTS, ELITA & LICAGE, Prague, Czech Republic, 24-27 May 2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/243420-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Whether primary liver transplantation (PLT) is superior to the upfront hepatic resection (HR) and salvage liver transplantation (SLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria is debatable. Aim of study: To compare the long-term survival rates of patients with HCC within Milan criteria undergoing PLT with those undergoing HR + SLT. Patients and methods: Patients with HCC within Milan criteria underwent PLT (n = 149) or HR + SLT (n = 26) were analyzed retrospectively from a prospective database. Patients' demographic characteristics, short-term and long-term outcome measures were compared between 2 groups. Results: Patients' demographic characteristics and tumor status were comparable between 2 groups. PLT group has significantly higher MELD score than HR + SLT group. More patients in HR + SLT group (80.7%) received living donor liver transplantation than those in PLT group (61.7%). Nevertheless, the graft weight to recipient standard liver volume was similar between groups. Hospital mortality was 2.6% in PLT group and 0% in HR + SLT group. The postoperative complication rate was comparable between groups. With median follow-up of 55 months, overall tumor recurrence rate was lower in PLT group (7.9%) than HR + SLT group (26.9%). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates for PLT group and HR + SLT group were 96%, 89.9%, 96.7% and 100%, 92.3%, 76.9%, respectively. (P = 0.110) On multivariate analysis, Preoperative serum alpha fetoprotein level and microvascular tumor invasion were independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusion: Both PLT and HR + SLT are effective treatment modalities for early stage HCC in terms of similar overall survival rate. However, tumor recurrence is significant high in HR + SLT group. Better patient selection in terms of those with favorable tumor characteristics is warrant in patients undergoing SLT for recurrent HCC.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofThe 2017 Joint International Congress of ILTS, ELITA & LICAGE-
dc.titleSingle-center experience of long-term survival outcome between primary liver transplantation and hepatic resection with consequent salvage transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan Criteria-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailNg, KCK: kkcng@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.hkuros275123-
dc.publisher.placePrague, Czech Republic-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats