File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/jcop.20374
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77955648736
- WOS: WOS:000277051800003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Intimate partner violence relationship dissolution among couples with children: The counterintuitive role of "law and order" neighborhoods
Title | Intimate partner violence relationship dissolution among couples with children: The counterintuitive role of "law and order" neighborhoods |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Citation | Journal of Community Psychology, 2010, v. 38, n. 4, p. 456-468 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This study examined the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) relationship dissolution and neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, ethnic heterogeneity, residential instability, collective efficacy, and legal cynicism. Data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) Longitudinal survey were used to identify 658 cases of IPV in Wave 1. A generalized boosting model (GBM) was used to determine the best proximal predictors of relationship dissolution from the longitudinal data. Controlling for these predictors, logistic regression of neighborhood characteristics from the PHDCN community survey was used to predict IPV relationship dissolution in Wave 2. Counterintuitively, the authors find that neighborhoods high in legal cynicism have a greater likelihood of IPV relationship dissolution, controlling for other variables in the logistic regression model. However, analyses did not find that IPV relationship dissolution was related to neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, ethnic heterogeneity, residential instability, and collective efficacy. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244107 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.878 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Emery, Clifton R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jolley, Jennifer | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Shali | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-31T08:56:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-31T08:56:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Community Psychology, 2010, v. 38, n. 4, p. 456-468 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0090-4392 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244107 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study examined the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) relationship dissolution and neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, ethnic heterogeneity, residential instability, collective efficacy, and legal cynicism. Data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) Longitudinal survey were used to identify 658 cases of IPV in Wave 1. A generalized boosting model (GBM) was used to determine the best proximal predictors of relationship dissolution from the longitudinal data. Controlling for these predictors, logistic regression of neighborhood characteristics from the PHDCN community survey was used to predict IPV relationship dissolution in Wave 2. Counterintuitively, the authors find that neighborhoods high in legal cynicism have a greater likelihood of IPV relationship dissolution, controlling for other variables in the logistic regression model. However, analyses did not find that IPV relationship dissolution was related to neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, ethnic heterogeneity, residential instability, and collective efficacy. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Community Psychology | - |
dc.title | Intimate partner violence relationship dissolution among couples with children: The counterintuitive role of "law and order" neighborhoods | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/jcop.20374 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77955648736 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 38 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 456 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 468 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1520-6629 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000277051800003 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0090-4392 | - |