File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Understanding Chronically Reported Families

TitleUnderstanding Chronically Reported Families
Authors
Keywordsservices utilization (not mental health)
child welfare services/child protection
risk assessment
longitudinal research
Issue Date2010
Citation
Child Maltreatment, 2010, v. 15, n. 4, p. 271-281 How to Cite?
AbstractAlthough a strong literature on child maltreatment re-reporting exists, much of that literature stops at the first re-report. The literature on chronic re-reporting, meaning reports beyond the second report, is scant. The authors follow Loman's lead in focusing on reports beyond the first two to determine what factors predict these "downstream" report stages. Cross-sector, longitudinal administrative data are used. The authors analyze predictors at each of the first four recurrences (first to second report, second to third report, third to fourth report, and fourth to fifth report). Findings demonstrate that some factors (e.g., tract poverty) which predict initial recurrence lose their predictive value at later stages, whereas others (e.g., aid to families with dependent children history) remain predictive across stages. In-home child welfare services and mental health treatment emerged as consistent predictors of reduced recurrence. © The Author(s) 2010.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244111
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.399
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJonson-Reid, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorEmery, Clifton R.-
dc.contributor.authorDrake, Brett-
dc.contributor.authorStahlschmidt, Mary Jo-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T08:56:05Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-31T08:56:05Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationChild Maltreatment, 2010, v. 15, n. 4, p. 271-281-
dc.identifier.issn1077-5595-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244111-
dc.description.abstractAlthough a strong literature on child maltreatment re-reporting exists, much of that literature stops at the first re-report. The literature on chronic re-reporting, meaning reports beyond the second report, is scant. The authors follow Loman's lead in focusing on reports beyond the first two to determine what factors predict these "downstream" report stages. Cross-sector, longitudinal administrative data are used. The authors analyze predictors at each of the first four recurrences (first to second report, second to third report, third to fourth report, and fourth to fifth report). Findings demonstrate that some factors (e.g., tract poverty) which predict initial recurrence lose their predictive value at later stages, whereas others (e.g., aid to families with dependent children history) remain predictive across stages. In-home child welfare services and mental health treatment emerged as consistent predictors of reduced recurrence. © The Author(s) 2010.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofChild Maltreatment-
dc.subjectservices utilization (not mental health)-
dc.subjectchild welfare services/child protection-
dc.subjectrisk assessment-
dc.subjectlongitudinal research-
dc.titleUnderstanding Chronically Reported Families-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1077559510380738-
dc.identifier.pmid20941889-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77957919853-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage271-
dc.identifier.epage281-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-6119-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000282636800001-
dc.identifier.issnl1077-5595-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats