File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Different time trend and management of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries

TitleDifferent time trend and management of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries
Authors
Keywordsendoscopic resection
current situation
time trend
Asian country
esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma
Issue Date2017
Citation
Digestive Endoscopy, 2017, v. 29, p. 18-25 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2017 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2017 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has been on the increase in Western countries. However, in Asian countries, data on the incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma are evidently lacking. In the present review, we focus on the current clinical situation of EGJ adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries: Japan, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. The incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma has been reported to be gradually increasing in Malaysia and Japan, whereas it has stabilized in Hong Kong. However, the number of cases in these countries is comparatively low compared with Western countries. A reason for the reported difference in the incidence and time trend of EGJ adenocarcinoma among the three countries may be explained by two distinct etiologies: one arising from chronic gastritis similar to distal gastric cancer, and the other related to gastroesophageal reflux disease similar to esophageal adenocarcinoma including Barrett's adenocarcinoma. This review also shows that there are several concerns in clinical practice for EGJ adenocarcinoma. In Hong Kong and Malaysia, many EGJ adenocarcinomas have been detected at a stage not amenable to endoscopic resection. In Japan, histological curability criteria for endoscopic resection cases have not been established. We suggest that an international collaborative study using the same definition of EGJ adenocarcinoma may be helpful not only for clarifying the characteristics of these cancers but also for improving the clinical outcome of these patients.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244244
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.557
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHatta, Waku-
dc.contributor.authorTong, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yeong Yeh-
dc.contributor.authorIchihara, Shin-
dc.contributor.authorUedo, Noriya-
dc.contributor.authorGotoda, Takuji-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T08:56:26Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-31T08:56:26Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationDigestive Endoscopy, 2017, v. 29, p. 18-25-
dc.identifier.issn0915-5635-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244244-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2017 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has been on the increase in Western countries. However, in Asian countries, data on the incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma are evidently lacking. In the present review, we focus on the current clinical situation of EGJ adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries: Japan, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. The incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma has been reported to be gradually increasing in Malaysia and Japan, whereas it has stabilized in Hong Kong. However, the number of cases in these countries is comparatively low compared with Western countries. A reason for the reported difference in the incidence and time trend of EGJ adenocarcinoma among the three countries may be explained by two distinct etiologies: one arising from chronic gastritis similar to distal gastric cancer, and the other related to gastroesophageal reflux disease similar to esophageal adenocarcinoma including Barrett's adenocarcinoma. This review also shows that there are several concerns in clinical practice for EGJ adenocarcinoma. In Hong Kong and Malaysia, many EGJ adenocarcinomas have been detected at a stage not amenable to endoscopic resection. In Japan, histological curability criteria for endoscopic resection cases have not been established. We suggest that an international collaborative study using the same definition of EGJ adenocarcinoma may be helpful not only for clarifying the characteristics of these cancers but also for improving the clinical outcome of these patients.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofDigestive Endoscopy-
dc.subjectendoscopic resection-
dc.subjectcurrent situation-
dc.subjecttime trend-
dc.subjectAsian country-
dc.subjectesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma-
dc.titleDifferent time trend and management of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/den.12808-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85018661606-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.spage18-
dc.identifier.epage25-
dc.identifier.eissn1443-1661-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000406840300005-
dc.identifier.issnl0915-5635-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats