File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: On the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation and concrete-nature Christology: A reply to James Arcadi

TitleOn the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation and concrete-nature Christology: A reply to James Arcadi
Authors
Loke, ATE
KeywordsCoherence of the Incarnation
Divine Preconscious Model
Concrete-nature
Abstract-nature
Apollinarianismus
Issue Date2017
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.degruyter.com/rs/261_5247_ENU_h.htm
Citation
Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 2017, v. 59 n. 1, p. 26-33 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2017-0002
AbstractIn a recent article published in NZSTh, James Arcadi offers an assessment of the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation. Arcadi objects that, because I aver that this model runs on a concrete-nature account of natures, I am not able to maintain the full humanity of Christ. I argue that Arcadi’s objections are not compelling, and while I appreciate his intention to offer constructive feedback, I explain that his suggestions that I embrace a form of neo-Apollinarianism by adopting the abstract-nature perspective of natures are unmotivated and disadvantageous.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244485
ISSN
0028-3517
2023 Impact Factor: 0.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.112
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:000397624700002

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoke, ATE-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T01:53:21Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-18T01:53:21Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationNeue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 2017, v. 59 n. 1, p. 26-33-
dc.identifier.issn0028-3517-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244485-
dc.description.abstractIn a recent article published in NZSTh, James Arcadi offers an assessment of the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation. Arcadi objects that, because I aver that this model runs on a concrete-nature account of natures, I am not able to maintain the full humanity of Christ. I argue that Arcadi’s objections are not compelling, and while I appreciate his intention to offer constructive feedback, I explain that his suggestions that I embrace a form of neo-Apollinarianism by adopting the abstract-nature perspective of natures are unmotivated and disadvantageous.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.degruyter.com/rs/261_5247_ENU_h.htm-
dc.relation.ispartofNeue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie-
dc.rights© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. The final publication is available at www.degruyter.com-
dc.subjectCoherence of the Incarnation-
dc.subjectDivine Preconscious Model-
dc.subjectConcrete-nature-
dc.subjectAbstract-nature-
dc.subjectApollinarianismus-
dc.titleOn the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation and concrete-nature Christology: A reply to James Arcadi-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLoke, ATE: andyloke@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLoke, ATE=rp01982-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/nzsth-2017-0002-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85016977281-
dc.identifier.hkuros277745-
dc.identifier.volume59-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage26-
dc.identifier.epage33-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000397624700002-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-
dc.identifier.issnl0028-3517-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats