File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Obstacles to aging-in-place: exploring caregiver's intention of the use of residential care service

TitleObstacles to aging-in-place: exploring caregiver's intention of the use of residential care service
Authors
Choy, CPJXu, JTang, YMJWong, GHYLau, MYLou, VWLum, TYS
Issue Date2016
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://gerontologist.gerontologyjournals.org
Citation
2016 Gerontological Society of America (GSA) Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts: New Lens on Aging: Changing Attitudes, Expanding Possibilities, New Orleans, LA, USA, 16-20 November 2016. In The Gerontologist, 2016, v. 56 n. Suppl. 3, p. 577 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw162.2317
AbstractThe institutionalization rate in Hong Kong is ranked one of the highest worldwide, despite the promotion of aging-in-place by policy-makers. This study aimed to explore the factors underlying the strong motivation for the application for residential care service (RCS). Participants were low-income family caregivers (N=348) taking care of an elder with moderate or severe level of impairment. Over a third (36.1%) of caregivers would have accepted the RCS offer if it had been made available. Caregiver burden and elders’ poor health were significantly associated with the decision of acceptance, whereas elders’ living arrangement and their use of community and informal (domestic helper) care were not. Thematic analysis on their consideration for such decision revealed that 21.8% believed elders would receive better care in a residential care home. The advantages of aging-in-place has been under-recognized. Enhancing the community care services may be helpful for further promoting ageing-in-place.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244573
ISSN
0016-9013
2021 Impact Factor: 5.422
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.524
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:000388585002621

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChoy, CPJ-
dc.contributor.authorXu, J-
dc.contributor.authorTang, YMJ-
dc.contributor.authorWong, GHY-
dc.contributor.authorLau, MY-
dc.contributor.authorLou, VW-
dc.contributor.authorLum, TYS-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T01:54:58Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-18T01:54:58Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citation2016 Gerontological Society of America (GSA) Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts: New Lens on Aging: Changing Attitudes, Expanding Possibilities, New Orleans, LA, USA, 16-20 November 2016. In The Gerontologist, 2016, v. 56 n. Suppl. 3, p. 577-
dc.identifier.issn0016-9013-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244573-
dc.description.abstractThe institutionalization rate in Hong Kong is ranked one of the highest worldwide, despite the promotion of aging-in-place by policy-makers. This study aimed to explore the factors underlying the strong motivation for the application for residential care service (RCS). Participants were low-income family caregivers (N=348) taking care of an elder with moderate or severe level of impairment. Over a third (36.1%) of caregivers would have accepted the RCS offer if it had been made available. Caregiver burden and elders’ poor health were significantly associated with the decision of acceptance, whereas elders’ living arrangement and their use of community and informal (domestic helper) care were not. Thematic analysis on their consideration for such decision revealed that 21.8% believed elders would receive better care in a residential care home. The advantages of aging-in-place has been under-recognized. Enhancing the community care services may be helpful for further promoting ageing-in-place.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://gerontologist.gerontologyjournals.org-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Gerontologist-
dc.titleObstacles to aging-in-place: exploring caregiver's intention of the use of residential care service-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChoy, CPJ: cpchoy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailTang, YMJ: jennitym@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, GHY: ghywong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLau, MY: mlau@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLou, VW: wlou@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLum, TYS: tlum@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTang, YMJ=rp01997-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, GHY=rp01850-
dc.identifier.authorityLou, VW=rp00607-
dc.identifier.authorityLum, TYS=rp01513-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/geront/gnw162.2317-
dc.identifier.hkuros277248-
dc.identifier.volume56-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl. 3-
dc.identifier.spage577-
dc.identifier.epage577-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000388585002621-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0016-9013-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats