File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Phase Correction for Three-Dimensional (3D) Diffusion-Weighted Interleaved EPI Using 3D Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding and Reconstruction (3D-MUSER)

TitlePhase Correction for Three-Dimensional (3D) Diffusion-Weighted Interleaved EPI Using 3D Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding and Reconstruction (3D-MUSER)
Authors
Keywords3D diffusion‐weighted imaging
3D interleaved EPI
3D phase correction
multiplexed sensitivity encoding
Issue Date2017
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0740-3194/
Citation
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2017, v. 79 n. 5, p. 2702-2712 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose Three‐dimensional (3D) multiplexed sensitivity encoding and reconstruction (3D‐MUSER) algorithm is proposed to reduce aliasing artifacts and signal corruption caused by inter‐shot 3D phase variations in 3D diffusion‐weighted echo planar imaging (DW‐EPI). Theory and Methods 3D‐MUSER extends the original framework of multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) to a hybrid k‐space‐based reconstruction, thereby enabling the correction of inter‐shot 3D phase variations. A 3D single‐shot EPI navigator echo was used to measure inter‐shot 3D phase variations. The performance of 3D‐MUSER was evaluated by analyses of point‐spread function (PSF), signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), and artifact levels. The efficacy of phase correction using 3D‐MUSER for different slab thicknesses and b‐values were investigated. Results Simulations showed that 3D‐MUSER could eliminate artifacts because of through‐slab phase variation and reduce noise amplification because of SENSE reconstruction. All aliasing artifacts and signal corruption in 3D interleaved DW‐EPI acquired with different slab thicknesses and b‐values were reduced by our new algorithm. A near‐whole brain single‐slab 3D DTI with 1.3‐mm isotropic voxel acquired at 1.5T was successfully demonstrated. Conclusion 3D phase correction for 3D interleaved DW‐EPI data is made possible by 3D‐MUSER, thereby improving feasible slab thickness and maximum feasible b‐value. Magn Reson Med 79:2702–2712, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244895
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.737
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.696
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, HCC-
dc.contributor.authorHui, SK-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, PW-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, X-
dc.contributor.authorChen, NK-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T02:01:00Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-18T02:01:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2017, v. 79 n. 5, p. 2702-2712-
dc.identifier.issn0740-3194-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/244895-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Three‐dimensional (3D) multiplexed sensitivity encoding and reconstruction (3D‐MUSER) algorithm is proposed to reduce aliasing artifacts and signal corruption caused by inter‐shot 3D phase variations in 3D diffusion‐weighted echo planar imaging (DW‐EPI). Theory and Methods 3D‐MUSER extends the original framework of multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) to a hybrid k‐space‐based reconstruction, thereby enabling the correction of inter‐shot 3D phase variations. A 3D single‐shot EPI navigator echo was used to measure inter‐shot 3D phase variations. The performance of 3D‐MUSER was evaluated by analyses of point‐spread function (PSF), signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), and artifact levels. The efficacy of phase correction using 3D‐MUSER for different slab thicknesses and b‐values were investigated. Results Simulations showed that 3D‐MUSER could eliminate artifacts because of through‐slab phase variation and reduce noise amplification because of SENSE reconstruction. All aliasing artifacts and signal corruption in 3D interleaved DW‐EPI acquired with different slab thicknesses and b‐values were reduced by our new algorithm. A near‐whole brain single‐slab 3D DTI with 1.3‐mm isotropic voxel acquired at 1.5T was successfully demonstrated. Conclusion 3D phase correction for 3D interleaved DW‐EPI data is made possible by 3D‐MUSER, thereby improving feasible slab thickness and maximum feasible b‐value. Magn Reson Med 79:2702–2712, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0740-3194/-
dc.relation.ispartofMagnetic Resonance in Medicine-
dc.rightsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine. Copyright © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.-
dc.rightsPreprint: This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Postprint: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Special Statement for Preprint only Before publication: 'This is a preprint of an article accepted for publication in [The Journal of Pathology] Copyright © ([year]) ([Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland])'. After publication: the preprint notice should be amended to follows: 'This is a preprint of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the Contribution as published in the print edition of the Journal]' For Cochrane Library/ Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, add statement & acknowledgement : ‘This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 20XX, Issue X. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.’ Please include reference to the Review and hyperlink to the original version using the following format e.g. Authors. Title of Review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 20XX, Issue #. Art. No.: CD00XXXX. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD00XXXX (insert persistent link to the article by using the URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD00XXXX) (This statement should refer to the most recent issue of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in which the Review published.)-
dc.subject3D diffusion‐weighted imaging-
dc.subject3D interleaved EPI-
dc.subject3D phase correction-
dc.subjectmultiplexed sensitivity encoding-
dc.titlePhase Correction for Three-Dimensional (3D) Diffusion-Weighted Interleaved EPI Using 3D Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding and Reconstruction (3D-MUSER)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChang, HCC: hcchang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailHui, SK: edshui@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChiu, PW: pwcchiu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChang, HCC=rp02024-
dc.identifier.authorityHui, SK=rp01832-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mrm.26944-
dc.identifier.pmid28940484-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85030176446-
dc.identifier.hkuros277077-
dc.identifier.volume79-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage2702-
dc.identifier.epage2712-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000425740900024-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0740-3194-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats